Stock Split - Judgment Search Results

In Re: Atlanta Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... further the company proposed to alter the capital structure of the company by effecting a stock split whereby a five fold increase would accrue to existing shareholders the egm of 16th february ..... continued price spiral accompanying an issue of convertible warrants followed by a proposal for a stock split an analysis of flow of funds related to the allotment of warrants revealed the following .....

Sebi Vs. Shri Jalaj Batra

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... which revealed prima facie as follows 2 1 first period before the stock split i e november 1 2000 to january 18 2005 during the ..... brokers and clients investigation revealed that during the first period before the stock split i e november 1 2004 to january 18 2005 the major ..... the first period 4258676 shares during the second period after the stock split i e january 19 2005 to march 11 2005 the major .....

Sebi Vs. Shri Anirudh Sethi

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... india microsoft limited no such news was informed to the stock exchange by the11 13 nov06 financial jump of rs 100 express stock split news on card indiabulls no such news was informed ..... to financial the stock exchange by the services company 12 14 nov06 financial .....

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-iii Vs. J.S. Electronics Pvt. Ltd ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2007)213CTR(Del)138; [2009]311ITR311(Delhi)

..... a large number of shares in large blocks from the delhi stock exchange the assessed submitted that necessary brokers notes were available and ..... into consideration the fact that shares of the erstwhile hcl were split up into shares of hcl hp ltd and hcl ltd 12 ..... completely lost sight of the scheme of arrangement which required the splitting up of the shares of the erstwhile hcl into the shares .....

Fedders Lloyd Corportion Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumb ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008BusLR42(SC); 2007(123)ECC271; 2007(149)LC271(SC); 2008(221)ELT3(SC); (2008)2SCC643; 2008AIRSCW1227; 2007(8)Supreme285; 2008(1)KCCRSN18

..... pvt ltd and that his job was to look after the stock of the finished goods received in the godown from new ..... the tribunal dismissed hence present appeal whether the appellant was manufacturing split air conditioners classifiable under tariff heading 84 15 of the ..... customers invoices were raised by the appellant for supply of split air conditioners show cause notice was issued to appellants and .....

Pradip Kumar Guha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2008)(2)SLJ332CAT

..... has explained the reasons for resorting to piecemeal procurements i e split purchases according to him the piecemeal procurements are made after ..... on the refusal by the indenters the latter get fresh stock every time after due inspection and test moreover there is ..... kolkata had procured huge quantities of the said drugs after splitting the supply orders to avoid seeking approval of the dghs .....

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. Aries and Aries ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)2MLJ1057

standard supplies like tisco hsl would be made and their stock strictly confirm to the size catalogue however the defenant supplied

The Commissioner of Central Vs. M.R. Plastics and Polymers (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)(117)ECC229

supplied to m s muppaneni diary was from the rejected stock supplied to m s apddcf ltd and m s apbc

Tata MaIn Hospital Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(2)JCR174(Jhr)]

at the same time apart from these two cases where splitting of the service and supply has been constitutionally permitted in

Stack (Appellant) Vs. Dowden (Respondent)

Court: House of Lords

i consider that there are no grounds for varying the split of the beneficial ownership which arose in 1993 on the