Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: states reorganisation act 1956 section 76 land and goods Page 98 of about 28,633 results (0.715 seconds)

Ashok Jesang Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1982)1GLR49

..... area of the state of gujarat excluding the saurashtra area, and the kutch area, of that state.section 3(39a)' saurashtra area of the 'state of bombay' shall mean the territories transferred to the new state of bombay under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the state re-organisation act, 1956 and after the 1st day of may 1960 the said territories which form part of the state of gujarat shall be known as the saurashtra area of the state of gujarat.now, therefore, one has to look to section 8 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 and section 8(1)(d) of the said act reads as under ..... -in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7 of the bombay land revenue code, 1879 (bon. ..... but we have to bear in mind that the notification issued on 1-9-1959 (supra) was for the purpose of defining the revenue districts and that was, therefore, issued under the bombay land revenue code, 1879, while notification dated 12-5-1958 was issued under the saurashtra children act, 1956. ..... that notification is as under:bombay land revenue code, 1879no. ..... the government of bombay issued another notification under the bombay land revenue code, 1879. .....

Sameen Banu Makrani and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1981)22GLR1084

..... this action of disconfirmation was challenged on two grounds, namely (i) it amounted to reduction in rank without compliance with the requirements of article 311(2), and (ii) the status of the respondents could not have been disturbed in view of the guarantee of the service conditions in the states reorganisation act, 1956. ..... : [1981]1scr746 , the circumstances under which the principle of audi alterant partem can be invoked and applied were examined in the context of an order of supe rsession of a municipal committee under section 238(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 which required that an opportunity should be given to the committee before the order of super session is ..... the government of bombay (1974) 44 bombay law reporter 577 a question arose whether under section 11 of the bombay revenue jurisdiction act, 1976, the suit of the plaintiff there was barred unless he had exhausted all the remedies allowed by law for the time being in ..... 1/- could be said to be a sale by public auction within the terms of section 167 of the bombay land revenue code which passes no title to the government and, therefore, void being barred under section 11 of the bombay revenue jurisdiction act. ..... 1/- and purchases the property....the supreme court held that there was no bar under section 11 since such a sale is void and no title would pass to the government by reason of such a sale and in any case there was no decision or order from which the plaintiff could have competently preferred an appeal .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Madanswarup and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1960Raj138

..... occasion to consider the distinction between the executive and the legislative acts of the ruler of another princely state of rajasthan, as an order of the council of that state passed in december, 1941 came up for consideration there, and a good deal of what has been said there applies to the present cases, and i am firmly of the opinion that there is no vestige of any legislative act in the arrangements made between the former state of bikaner and the plaintiffs and that what had really happened in this case was ..... provisions of article 295 of the constitution, or on the present state of rajasthan on account of anything contained in the states reorganisation act. ..... held by their lordships of the supreme court that the word ''impossible' in section 56 of the contract act has not been used in the sense of physical or literal impossibility.their lordships have laid down that the performance of an act may not be literally impossible but it may be impracticable and useless from the point of view of the object and purpose which the parties had in view, and if an untoward event or change of circumstances totally upsets the very foundation upon which ..... 76 of 1956 d/-20-11-1956 wherein the position of a certain lawyer as public prosecutor came up for consideration as he claimed protection under article 311 of the constitution. .....

The State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Smt. Rekha Mahawar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(4)Raj3201

..... : the present state of rajasthan came into being on november 1, 1956 in accordance with the states reorganisation act, 1956 (hereinafter 'the act') consisting of the territories mentinoed in section 10 thereof. ..... such basic bundle of facts and cause of action would lie(i) in motor accident claims cases at the place where the accident took place or the death or injury took place;(ii) in central excise matters, where the manufacturing of the goods takes place;(iii) in sales tax matters where the sale of relevant transaction took place;(iv) in revenue matters where the land in question is situated;(v) in irrigation matters where the land is situated;(vi) in state excise matters where the excisable ..... commodity is manufactured or sold;(vii) in service matters where the person concerned has served or where the employer department where he served is based,(viii) in company law matters under companies act where the registered .....

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj63; 2003(2)WLN28

..... thus, the rajasthan high court ordinance being in existent, it had overriding effect over the state reorganisation act and its application stood excluded over and above rajasthan high court ordinance. ..... another argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is in relation to act of 1956 and he has placed reliance on section 52 of act of 1956. ..... noticing various decisions of various courts came to the conclusion thus:--'we find in the above provision that though an appeal is provided directly to the supreme court from the judgment and decree passed by high court in appeal under section 54, it does not exclude specifically or by necessary implication any intra-court appeal as may be provided under letters patent act or high court ordinance nor any prohibition against 'second appeal' as such was envisaged as under the arbitration ..... itself, the question raise by the court was in the following terms:'the question is whether remedy of intra court appeal provided under relevant letters patent or high court ordinance cases to be available in view of the provisions of section 54 of the land acquisition act. .....

Terminated Full Time Temporary Lic Employees Welfare Association Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ1030Mad; (1992)IIMLJ573

..... after the merger of the state of pepsu with the state of punjab by virtue of the operation of the states reorganisation act, 1956, the successor government cancelled the previous order of confirmation, the validity of which was challenged and which was upheld by the supreme court holding that ..... whatever may have been the presumed or the expressed intention of the legislating authority when enacting ordinance 19 of 1946 the words of clause 3 read along with the definition of the requisitioned land contained in clause 2 (3) of the ordinance are quite clear and it would not be within the province of the courts to speculate as to what was intended to be covered by clause 3 of the ordinance when the only interpretation which could be put upon the terms thereof is ..... the force of this argument it is however necessary to observe that although ordinarily there should be a close approximation between the non obstante clause and the operative part of the section, the non obstante clause need not necessarily and always be extensive with the operative part, so as to have the effect of cutting down the clear terms of an enactment. ..... will apply to situations in which the weaker party is in a position in which he can obtain goods or services or means of livelihood only upon the terms imposed by the stronger party or go without ..... a good deal of illegal employment market has developed resulting in a new source of corruption and frustration of those who are waiting at the employment exchanges .....

Sachindra Mohan Nandy and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1963Cal373

..... on this point led to the chandernagore (assimilation of laws) (amendment) act, 1959 (west bengal act v of 1959) which introduced the new section 8 stating that notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in any judgment or decision of any court, tribunal or authority, three specific acts-- (1) the west bengal land development and planning act, 1943, (2) the west bengal non-agricultural tenancy act, 1949, and (3) the west bengal estates acquisition act, 1953 shall extend to and be deemed always to have extended to chandernagore with effect from the ..... thereafter came the constitution (seventh) amendment act as a sequel to the states reorganisation act of 1956 on 1-11-56 whereby in the first schedule of the constitution express reference was made to chandernagore under the state of west bengal. ..... section 3(2) of the west bengal land (requisition and acquisition) act, 1948, provides that an order under section 3(1) shall be served in the prescribed manner on the owner of the land and where the order relates to land in occupation (of an occupier, not being the owner of the land) also on such occupier. .....

Present : Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram Senior Advocate with Vs. Board of Control ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the chief justice has full power, authority and jurisdiction in the matter of allocation of business of the high court which flows not only from the provisions contained in sub-section (3) of section 51 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, but inheres in him in the very nature of ..... (2010) 10 scc 320.the supreme court held that the chief justice has full power, authority and jurisdiction in the matter of allocation of business of the high court which flows not only from the provisions contained in sub section (3) of section 51 of the states reorganization act, 1956, but inheres in him in the very nature of things. ..... of judicature at lahore, in the exercise of its original or appellate jurisdiction, may be performed by any judge, or by any division court, thereof, appointed or constituted for such purpose in pursuance of section one hundred and eight of the government of india act, 1915; and if such division court is composed of two or more judges and the judges are divided in opinion as to the decision to be given on any point, such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the judges, if there be a ..... the assessee is able to establish that the assessing officer was in fact biased in the sense that he was involved or interested in his personal capacity in the outcome of the assessment or the procedure for assessment, no doubt, it would be a good ground for setting aside the assessment order. ..... words they do not supplant the law of the land but supplement it. .....

Lakshmana Rao Yadavalli and anr Vs. State of A.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , question arose whether rule of perpetuity would be applicable in respect of a member of a sikh judicial commission constituted under the sikh gurdwaras act, 1925 and in that context the words used from time to time that find place in sections 40 and 70 of punjab reorganisation act, 1996 fell for interpretation. ..... the majority in the constitution bench referred to the entries 52, 54, 96 and 97 of the union list (list-i) and entries 23, 49, 50 and 56 of the state list (list-ii) of the seventh schedule, adverted to issues pertaining to tax legislation and dwelled upon how the nature of tax levied is different from the measure of tax and culled out number of principles two of which are reproduced below: (6) land , the term as occurring in entry 49 of list ii, has a wide connotation. ..... , which makes provisions for levying a cess, whether by way of tax to augment the revenue resources of the state or by way of fee to render services as quid pro quo but without any intention of regulating and controlling the subject of the levy, cannot be said to have encroached upon the field of regulation and control belonging to the central government by reason of the incidence of levy being permissible to be passed on to the buyer or consumer, and thereby affecting the price of the commodity or goods. .....

Pradeep Kumar Maskara and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 728 of 2002, 429 of 2002 and 430 of 2002, whereby the high court dismissed the aforementioned writ applications holding that the question as to whether chapter iib of the west bengal land reforms act would be applicable qua the appellants in view of the fact that they belonged to a place which was in erstwhile state of bihar and by virtue of the state reorganisation act, their lands were included in the state of west bengal was decided against the appellants relying on the judgment in case of ..... the first time in the west bengal land reforms act, 1955, and the state government issued notification no.1516-l ref.11 february, 1971, which reads as under:- in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (2) of section 1 of the west bengal land reforms (amendment) act, 1971 (president act no.3 of 1971) the governor is pleased hereby to appoint the 12th day of the february as the date on which all the provisions of the said act except those in clause (1) of section 7 and section 13, 15 and 17 thereof shall come into force in ..... as noticed above, the land in question was transferred from the state of bihar to the state of west bengal pursuant to the enactment of bihar and west bengal (transferred territories) act, 1956 and the provisions of west bengal land reforms act were extended to the ..... dismissed the application on the ground that the decision of the high court in gangadhar singh s case (supra) is binding precedents and the earlier judgment of the high court is no longer a good law. .....