Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: states reorganisation act 1956 section 76 land and goods Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1,455 results (0.254 seconds)

Thiashola Plantations Private Ltd. Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu represe ...

Court : Chennai

..... while so, the settlement officer published a notification dated 03.08.2011 in the district gazette of nilgiris under section 53 of the act on 11.08.2011 specifying the taluks, village names, survey numbers and extent of ryotwari lands and forest lands, impugning which, these writ petitions have been filed. 8. ..... direct the state government to complete the survey andsettlement of all janmam land under the janmam act and notify them as janmam forests under section 53 of the gudalur janmam act and notifying them as reserved forest under the tamil nadu forest act, 1882 by completing all the formalities within the period of three months. ..... all the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, in unison, submitted that a pre-decisional hearing by the settlement officer under section 53 of the act read with rules 37 and 38 of the rules is a sine qua non and even if the section does not provide specifically for the same, principles of natural justice, which inheres in every administrative and quasi judicial action, casts a duty upon authorities, to hear the aggrieved parties before passing an order that is likely to affect their ..... after the reorganisation of the states in 1956, certain portions of gudalur went into the control of the state of kerala and certain other portions fell within tamil nadu. .....

V. Ravichandran Vs. the Director, Employment and Training,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(4)CTC496

..... --(1) where by virtue of the provisions of part ii of the state reorganisation act, 1956 (37 of 1856), or any other enactment relating to reorganisation of states any cooperative society which immediately before the day on which the reorganisation takes place had its objects confined to one state becomes, as from that day, a multi-state cooperative society, it shall be deemed to be a multi-state cooperative society registered under the corresponding provisions of this act and the bye-laws of such society shall, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this ..... (5) notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where a scheme under sub-section (2) includes any proposal regarding the transfer of all the assets and liabilities of any multi-state cooperative society referred to in clause (b) thereof, the scheme shall not be binding on such multi-state cooperative society or the shareholders and creditors thereof, unless the proposal regarding such transfer is accepted by that multi-state cooperative society by a resolution passed by a majority of the members present at a meeting of its general body. .....

Velayudam Thankayyan Vs. Rev. G.W.T. Trowell

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1966Mad32

..... madras state by virtue of the states reorganisation act 37 of 1956. ..... upon well-settled principles of law, the rights which would accrue to the plaintiffs would be the rights governing the lis at its commencement, and that such rights would be available to both parties for the entire career of the litigation, regarded as an intrinsic unity, unaffected by any ..... the validity of that union, in the context of the congregational practices of the constituent churches of the travancore church council and the tenets of the newly formed church of south india, has been the subject matter of controversy in this litigation, and related litigations, disposed of by common judgments at very considerable length; but, for the restricted purposes of this appeal, it is quite unnecessary to proceed into this controversy, ..... , here appellant), had absolutely no right to possession of the church property, that he was never in such possession, and that he should now be directed to surrender possession, and not to disturb or interfere with the possession of the plaintiffs and their conduct of the rituals and ceremonies of the church, in accordance with the church union, in the church at marthandam. ..... the second is: is the defendant (appellant) claiming any right to possession or any other right whatever as a private individual, and, at the highest for him, a single member of the alleged congregation of marthandam?the second question is equally important for the simple reason that the plaintiffs do not .....

N. Thangappan Vs. Subadra

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1972Mad10; (1971)IIMLJ220

..... states reorganisation act 1956, the said madras act continues in force and applies to all hindus in the present state of madras, who are governed by the marumakattayam law of inheritance, and all hindus outside that state, governed by that law in respect of properties within the state. ..... sections 119 and 120 of the states reorganisation act, the madras act which is a law made by the composite state continues to apply to those areas which were originally in the composite state of madras but subsequently added to the kerala state, with such modifications and adaptations which the kerala legislature might think fit to make.in this case after the reorganisation act the kerala act ..... it is pointed out that so far as madras act is concerned it does not make a provision for any permanent alimony being granted by a court in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, that the new right created by section 110-b introduced by the kerala act cannot be operative in the madras state, and that the madras act without the said amendment alone will be applicable in ..... held that the words must be understood with some limitation so that the jurisdiction conferred by that section does not extend to places outside india, as otherwise the operation of the section would extend to areas over which the indian legislature has no legislative control, and that when section 488(8) speaks of a district, where a person last resided with his wife, it can only mean 'where he last resided with his wife in any .....

V.K. Balakrishnan Nair Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1957Mad769

..... on 2nd january 1957, relying upon the fact on 1st november 1956 the new state of kerala was formed under the states reorganisation act, he presented a petition to the government of madras-submitting that it had no jurisdiction to take any action in his case and that the entire matter must be transferred to the kerala for action by them. ..... the appellant founded his petition on the provisions of the states reorganisation act and in particular on section 116. ..... as this section and section 115 of the act have a material bearing on the point in issue, we give below the material portion of these two sections:section 115(2): every person who immediately before the appointed day is serving in connection with the affairs of an existing state part of whose territories is transferred to another state by the provisions of part ii shall, as from that day, provisionally continue to serve in connection with the affairs of the principal successor state to that existing state, unless he is required by general or special order of the ..... "the contention of the appellant as set out in his affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is that by virtue of the provisions of section 116(1) of the act, he, who was holding the post of permanent lower division clerk in malabar, automatically became a civil servant in the service of the keraia state on 1st november 1958 and therefore the government of madras could not take any disciplinary proceedings against him. .....

K.L. Karibeeran and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad292

..... it was modified by the order issued under section 41 of the states reorganisation act, 1956. ..... it was held by the bench that the power under section 41 of the states reorganisation act extended only to making such modification in the original scheduled castes order, as was compatible with the territorial changes and formation of new states, and, it therefore, did not authorise the president to exclude any person from the category of a scheduled caste, who enjoyed that status under the original scheduled castes order.13. ..... 1271 of air):--(6) it may be accepted that it is not open to make any modification in the order by producing evidence to show (for example) that though caste a alone is mentioned in the order, caste b is also a part of caste a and, therefore, must be deemed to be included in caste a, it may also be accepted that wherever one caste has another name it has been mentioned in brackets after it in the order: (see aray (mala), dakkal (dokkalwar) etc. ..... .the collector of north arcot ambedkar district has since reported that kurumans community which has been included in the list of scheduled tribes throughout tamil nadu except kanyakumari district and senkottah taluk of tirunelveli district is not in existence in the north arcot and ambedkar district.in view of the several representations being received from various communities requesting to include them in the list of scheduled tribes, the government have constituted a committee of authropologists, with .....

Chattanatha Karayalar Vs. the State of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1966Mad220

..... (3) as a result of the state reorganisation act, 1956, shencottah taluk merged in the territory of the state of madras with effect from 1-11-1956. ..... 3 is the charging section, the fourth requires the licencee to keep certain books of accounts in the prescribed form, the fifth confers powers on the government to appoint inspecting officers, the sixth provides for recovery of duty due under the act as if it was an arrear of land revenue, the seventh provides for the licencee to reimburse himself from consumer in certain cases, the eighth contains penalties and the ninth confers on the government to make rules to carry out the ..... legal proceeding with respect to any property, rights or liabilities subject to apportionment under the act, the successor state which succeeded to or acquired a share in that property or those rights or liabilities by virtue of any provision of the act should be deemed to be substituted for the existing state as a party to those proceedings or added as a party thereto as the case may be and the proceedings might continue accordingly.section 125(1) states that every proceeding pending before the appointed day before a court, other than .....

State Industried Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd., Madras Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad116; (1991)IMLJ469

..... the area in which the land is situate having thereafter been allotted to the state of gujarat on the bifurcation of the state of bombay under the states reorganisation act 1960, a divisional commissioner of the state of gujarat issued a notification under s. ..... the learned single judge, who heard the writ petitions, took note of the principle that inordinate delay in the prosecution of the land acquisition proceedings must be frowned upon as vitiating the very land acquisition proceedings and repelling the only contention put forth by the fourth-respondent that a writ of mandamus would not lie because there is no duty cast upon the respondents to drop the acquisition proceedings, allowed the writ petitions. ..... commencement of the act 68 of 1984, the award shall be made within a period of two years from such commencement and in the instant case that period had not yet lapsed when the writ petitions were heard and disposed of by the learned single judge and further on the filing of the writ petitions in june, 1985, there were orders of stay and learned counsel for the fourth-respondent submits that in the said circumstances, the land acquisition proceedings ..... 1321 to 1323 of 1986 as against the very same common order of the learned singlejudge and those writ appeals have been dismissed by a bench of this court on 5-1-1987 and in the said circumstances, it is open to the fourth-respondent to reagitate the matter on merits assuming that it has locus standi to do so. .....

T. Mariasingha Chettiar Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1963)IMLJ365; [1963]14STC424(Mad)

..... territories which immediately before thecommencement of this constitution wereeither comprised in the province of madrasor were being administered as if theyformed part of that province and theterritories specified in section 4of the states reorganisation act,1956, but excluding the territoriesspecified in sub-section (1) ofsection 3 and sub-section (1) ofsection 4 of the andhra state act,1953, and the territories specifiedin clause (b)of sub-section (1) ofsection 5, section 6 and clause (d) ofsub-section (1) of section 7 of thestates reorganisation act, 1956.' * * * *5. ..... section 3 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, added the territories comprised in that area to the andhra pradesh state ..... is authority for the position that section 119 of the states reorganisation act is a transitory provision which extends and continues the laws prevailing in the merged territories as if there had been no merger at all till parliament or other competent authority replaces those laws by enacting new laws or by adapting other laws in the state in which they became merged. ..... 1958 a division bench of this court, to which one of us was a party, had occasion to consider the proper interpretation of section 53 of the andhra state act, the language of which is almost identical with the language of section 119 of the states reorganisation act. ..... area was integrated with the andhra pradesh the laws of that territory were preserved under the states reorganisation act by virtue of section 119 of the act. .....

Orj Electronics Oxides Ltd. Vs. Customs, Excise and Service Tax and an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(225)ELT202(Mad); (2008)1MLJ1; 2009[16]STR240

..... the presidential notification dated 6.7.2004, whereby a permanent bench at madurai was constituted, inter alia reads as follows:the madras high court (establishment of a permanent bench at madurai) order, 2004 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 51 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 (37 of 1956), the president, after consultation with the governor of tamil nadu and the chief justice of the madras high court, is pleased to make the following order, namely: 1. ..... we, with respect, reiterate that the law laid down by a four- judge bench of this court in nasiruddin's case : [1976]1scr505 holds good even today despite the incorporation of an explanation to section 141 to the code of civil procedure. 15. ..... writs must be 'within those territories', which clearly implies that they must be amenable to its jurisdiction either by residence or location within those territories.as to the cause of action, the court stated: the rule that cause of action attracts jurisdiction in suits is based on statutory enactment and cannot apply to writs issuable under article 226 which makes no reference to any cause of action or where it arises but insists on the presence of the person or authority 'within the .....