Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3793 OF2016VINOD KUMAR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR GANDHI RESPONDENT(S) With C.A. No.8972-8973/2017, C.A.No.6063 of 2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.19965/2017), C.A.No.6064 of 2019 (arising out of SLP(C) No.20414/2017), C.A.Nos. 6066-6072 of 2019 (arising out of SLP(C) No.20735- 20741/2017), C.A.No.6073 of 2019 (arising out of SLP(C) No.22383/2017), C.A. No.16916/2017 and C.A.No.6075 of 2019 (arising out of SLP(C) No.28455/2017) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals, except one where leave to defend was granted, have been filed against the judgment of Delhi High Court dismissing the Rent Control Revisions filed by the appellants in which the order passed by the Rent Controller rejecting the 2 application filed by the appellants-tenants seeking leave to defend in a petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 have been challenged.3. The appellants are ten...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26h DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.31490 OF2016(S-RES)BETWEEN : SRI.B.S.DALAYATH AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O.LATE SUBANSAHEB ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.1, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SUB DIVISION (NORTH) 17-18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 PETITIONER (BY SRI.RAJGOPAL, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI.NISHANTH A.V. (NOC), ADV.) AND:1. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD, 1ST FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009 BY IT CHAIRMAN STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 T.R.SRINIVASA S/O.LATE T.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT52YEARS WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER S.T.P (V & H) DIVISION BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD NAYANDANDAHALLI2 3. 2 BANGALORE-560 039... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.L.SANJEEV, ADV. FOR R1 & R2 SRI.M.S.BHAGWAT, ADV. FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAY...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No(s). 5737 of 2019 (@ SLP(C) No.16928/2018) State of Jharkhand & Anr Appellant(s) Versus Amresh Narayan Sinha Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand dated 12 April 2017. The Division Bench directed the appellant that, upon the revocation of the suspension of the respondent, he should be given full pay and allowances for the period of suspension, though the disciplinary proceedings have not been concluded. The respondent was engaged, at the material time, as a Veterinary Officer in the service of the State of Bihar. In June 2005, his services were allotted to the State of Jharkhand after the reorganisation of States. Sanction was issued on 17 2 February 2006 for his prosecution in CBI Case No.RC5A) 2005-Pet under Section 120B, 201, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code and Section 13(2)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No(s). 5709 of 2019 @SLP(C) No.5485 of 2019 State of Bihar & Ors Appellant(s) Versus Dr Chaitraya Kumar Singh & Ors Respondent(s) Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J JUDGMENT Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand by which a direction that was issued by the learned Single Judge to the State of Bihar to issue orders for accepting the first respondent as its em- ployee on transfer from the State of Jharkhand has been upheld. The first respondent was appointed as an Ayurvedic Medical Officer on 26 May 1989 in the erstwhile State of Bihar prior to its reorganization. On 15 November 2000, the Bihar Re-organisation Act resulted in the bifurcation of the erstwhile State into the State of Bihar and the State of Jharkhand. Options were invited from the employees for allocation of their services to either of the resulting States. The first respondent opted...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.5302 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.23592 OF2014 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS LAFARGE DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.460 OF2005CIVIL APPEAL No.461 OF2005CIVIL APPEAL No.7073 OF2005CIVIL APPEAL No.2343 OF2007CIVIL APPEAL No.5303 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.10520 OF2013 CIVIL APPEAL No.5304 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.1334 OF2014 CIVIL APPEAL No.5305 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.10165 OF2014 CIVIL APPEAL No.5306 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.23297 OF2014 CIVIL APPEAL No.5308 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.6729 OF2016 Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.23592 of 2014 & Ors.Page 1 of 38 A N D (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.16550 OF2016 5307 CIVIL APPEAL N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:10. h APRIL, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on :9. h JULY, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8241/2013 MEERA SAHNI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Anil K. Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.S. Maan & Ms.Akanksha Choudhary, Advocates GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Yeeshu Jain & Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsels with Mr.Govind Kumar, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr.Kushal Tater, Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Mr.Shashi Kant Maurya & Mr.Sharf Habibullah, Advocates for LAC & L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Ishaan Verma, Advocate for the DDA. Raj CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.1.... Petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The following reliefs were sought: A. Issue a writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of prohibitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10720 OF2018STATE OF MEGHALAYA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION, DIMA-HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10611 OF2018THE STATE COORDINATION COMMITTEE OF COAL OWNERS, MINERS AND DEALERS FORUM ALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION DIMA HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS ...APPELLANT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.10907 OF2018GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION DIMA HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL No.5272 OF2016WITH KA HIMA NONGSTOIN LAND OWNERS, COAL TRADERS AND PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION ...APPELLANT(S) ALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION DIMA HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS2WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2019(@C.A. DIARY No.3067 OF2018 LBER LALOO ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION, HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 2934/2013 % 1. HEERA SINGH Through: Mr. I.C. Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R1 and R-2 Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Mr. Siddharth Garg and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0107.2019 Following almost two centuries of hegemonic British rule, India attained independence on 15th August, 1947. Various schemes were introduced, by the Indian Government, to commemorate those who had shed their blood and sweat for the countrys struggle for independence, one among them being the SSS Pension Scheme relating to Freedom Fighters Pension.2. The first scheme, providing for grant of pension to freedom fighters and their family members, was originally introduced in 1973, and was substituted by a fresh scheme, which came to be known as the Swatantrata Sainik Samman (SSS) Pension Scheme, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 156/2019 ANS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sushil Aggarwal and Ms. Vasundhra Nayyar, Advocates. versus RAMAGUNDMA FERTILIZER & CHEMICALS LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER2405.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A. 7774/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 156/2019 2. The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeks restraining order against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from invoking the Bank Guarantee No.50/2016 for an amount of Rs. 1,73,25,810/- issued by Respondent No.3 (Canara Bank) in favour of Respondent No.1. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 156/2019 Page 1 of 19 Brief Facts 3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that the... Petitioner is a company engaged in the busin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :23. 05.2017, 21.02.2019 & 1.04.2019 Date of decision :16. 05. 2019 + W.P.(C) No.8495/2016 and CM Nos. 8560/2017, 7216/2017, 30264/2017, 30263/2018, 44270/2018 and 148/2019 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS UNION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind Nayar, Sr. Advocate Kumar, with Mr.Sushant Advocate versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr.Y.P.Rao, Mr. Pranav Subramanyam, Ms.Arzoo Raj, Mr.Pradeep Kumat Tripathi, Mr.Anil Kapoor, Advocats for R-1 + W.P.(C) No.9260/2016 and CM Nos. 37406/2018 and 4084/2019 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA HANDLING WORKERS UNION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Colin Gonsalves, Sr. versus Advocate with Mr.Ali Qambar Zaidi, Advocates THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR,FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr.Y.P.Rao, Mr. Pranav Subramanyam, Ms.Arzoo Raj, Mr.Pradeep Kumat Tripathi, Mr.Anil W.P.(C) No.8495/2016, 92...
Tag this Judgment!