Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: states reorganisation act 1956 section 3 transfer of territory from hyderabad to andhra and alteration of name Page 1 of about 69 results (0.266 seconds)

Jun 05 1959 (HC)

Employees, State Insurance Corporation Per Its Insurance Inspector, Az ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP455; 1960CriLJ1184

..... transfer of territory from hyderabad to andhra and alteration of name: (1) as from the appointed day, there shall be added to the state of andhra the territories comprised in-- (a) the districts of hyderabad, medak, nizama-bad, karimnagar, warangal, kahmmam, nalgonda and mahabubnagar;' in the above clause the reference is to the telan-gana districts and old hyderabad state which had been added on to the old andhra state so as to make up the present andhra pradesh state, and in this we find a reference to the hyderabad district. ..... now, the andhra pradesh state was formed by the states reorganisation act xxxvii of 1956. ..... a reference to section 3(1) of the act shows what districts of telan-gana or of the old hyderabad state, had been added to the andhra pradesh. ..... the complaint was filed, under section 86(2) of the employees' state insurance act of 1948.3 the learned additional munsif and first class magistrate, secunderabad, held that the inspector aziz qureshi is only authorised under ex. ..... 460/3 of 1957, finding the accused not guilty of charges under section 86(2) of the em-ployees's state insurance act, 1948 and ordering dismissal of the complaint made by the complainant in the case.2 the complaint in this case was preferred by one insurance inspector, aziz qureshi, on behalf of the employees' state insurance corporation at secunderabad, against one bade saheb as the principal employer of shivaji press carrying on business at secunderabad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1959 (HC)

Mukundas Proprietor, Krishna Cycle Stores, Secunderabad Vs. State of A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP298; [1960]11STC420(AP)

..... section 3 of that act provided for certain territorial changes and among them was the transfer of territory from hyderabad to ahdhra and the alteration of the name of the latter state. ..... it was contended by the petitioners that under section 119 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 there were during the relevant period, two separate acts in force, namely, the hyderabad sales tax act in the area popularly known as telangana which previously formed part of the erstwhile state of hyderabad, and the madras general sales tax act in the rest of the state of andhra pradesh and that sales effected by them to dealers in the andhra area of the state should be deemed to be inter-state sales. ..... the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956, included the territories specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the andhra state act, 1953, and the territories specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, in the state of andhra pradesh and as a consequence of the reorganisation, the state of hyderabad ceased to exist. ..... in this revision case a somewhat novel point has been raised, and that is, whether after the reorganisation of states on the 1st november 1956, transactions of sale involving the movement of goods from the telangana area into the andhra area (both areas being constituent parts of the state of andhra pradesh) can be deemed to be inter-state sales.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1963 (SC)

M. Ramappa Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC777; (1966)IILLJ152SC; [1964]1SCR671

..... we are concerned with thehyderabad act and the states reorganisation act, 1956 (act no. ..... will, therefore, be seen that the states reorganisation act applieseven if it is inconsistent with anything in the hyderabad public servants(tribunal of enquiry) act, 1950. ..... thehigh court held that in view of the provisions of the states reorganisation actand the notification issued by the government of andhra pradesh on november 1,1956, by which the tribunal for disciplinary proceedings in andhra pradesh wasnamed as the authority to function under the hyderabad public servants (tribunalof enquiry) act, 1950, mr. ..... the centralgovernment, as respects any part c state, and the state government as respectsany new state or any transferred territory, may be notification in the officialgazette specify the authority, officer or person who, as from the appointedday, shall be competent to exercise such functions exercisable under any law inforce on that day as may be mentioned in that notification and such law shallhave effect accordingly.' 7. ..... it provided that thegovernment of the succeeding state could make adaptations and modifications ofthe law of an existing state whether by way of repeal or amendment, as may benecessary or expedient, and after such adaptations, every such law was to haveeffect until altered, repealed or amended by a competent legislature or othercompetent authority ..... under this section the appellant automatically beganto serve the successor state, namely, the state of andhra pradesh. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1969 (SC)

A. V. S. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC422; (1969)1SCC839; [1970]1SCR115

..... telengana area comprises all the territories specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the states reorganisation act, 1956.under section 4, the rules had to be laid before each house of parliament for a period of not less than 30 days and parliament could make such alterations as it liked. ..... offices of the heads of departments of the state government of andhra pradesh situated in the cities of hyderabad and secunderabad, the requirement as to residence laid down in this rule shall apply to the filling of only the second vacancy in every unit of three vacancies which are to be filled by direct recuriment;provided further that any period of temporary absence from telengana area for the purpose of prosecuting his studies or for undergoing medical treatment or any period of such temporary absence ..... on january 19, 1969, leaders of all political parties in the legislature of the andhra pradesh state appeared to have met and reached the decision that to implement what are called 'telengana safeguards', the following measures should be taken :all non-domicile persons, who have been appointed either directly, by promotion or by transfer to posts reserved under the andhra pradesh public employment (requirement as to residence) rules, 1959 for domiciles of telengana region will be immediately relieved from service. ..... names of such incumbents were to be shown in a proforma and they were to be employed in the andhra region without break in service by creating supernumerary posts, if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1961 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Gordhandas Keshavji Gandhi and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1962Guj128; (1962)0GLR269

..... .'now it is obvious that the words 'law in force' in section 119 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, must bear the same meaning as those words in section 87 of she bombay reorganisation act, 1960, for both the sections were enacted for the same purpose namely, preserving the territorial extent and application, of laws which were in forces immediately before the appointed day ..... . several territories were transferred from the former stage of hyderabad to the state of andhra and from the former state of travancore-cochin to the state of madras ..... . the principle of law that when a new stats is created out of the territories belonging to other state or states the pre-existing laws of such state or states continue in force until altered, amended or repealed by the new state, is a principle of state succession which applies only when the formation of the new state involves change of sovereignty and cannot apply when the new state is formed out of the territories of other existing state or states within the union of india under the authority of the constitution, for no change of sovereignty is involved in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2018 (SC)

The State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretary Vs. State of Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... official gazette; (m) "principal successor state" means (i) in relation to the existing state of bombay, madhya pradesh, madras or rajasthan, the state with the same name; and (ii) in relation to the existing states of hyderabad, madhya bharat and travancore cochin, the states of andhra pradesh, madhya pradesh and kerala, respectively; (o) "successor state", in relation to an existing state, means any state to which the whole or any part of the territories of that existing state is transferred by the provisions of part ii, and includes in relation to the existing state of madras, also that state as territorially altered by the said provisions and the union; 160 130. ..... the project and for section 119 of the reorganisation act, 1956 reads as under:- section 119. ..... it may be noted here that the tribunal has referred to section 2(m) defining principal successors state , section 2(o) defining successor state and section 5 to conclude that the state of kerala had become the principal successor state to the erstwhile state of 158 travancore-cochin excluding the territories transferred to the state of madras and also a successor state in respect of the territories which were transferred from madras and, therefore, the agreements would be binding on it, as the cauvery basin including the portion of rivers kabini and bhawani were in the malabar district, which had been transferred to it. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1999 (HC)

Bommisetty Prasada Rao, and Others Vs. Sas Mines and Minerals Ltd., Hy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD358; 1999(3)ALT521; [1999]98CompCas48(AP)

..... from what has been stated in the preceding paragraphs, it is evident that by virtue of section 30 of the andhra state act, 1953 read with section 52 of the state reorganisation act, 1956, the andhra pradesh high court being the successor of the madras high court had ail such original, appellate and other jurisdiction as, only in respect of the territories that were transferred from the madras state and included in the state of andhra pradesh, under the law in force immediately before the prescribed day, was exereisable in respect of such transferred territories ..... section 3 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, after including certain territories as mentioned in clauses (b) to (g) in mahabubnagar, hyderabad ..... and we do further ordain and declare that all the provisions of these our letters patent are subject to the legislative power of the governor-general in legislative council, and also the governor-general in council under section 71 of the government of india act, 1915, and also of the governor-general, in cases of emergency under section 72 of that act and may be in all respects amended and altered ..... no.38/1998 for appointment of sole arbitrator under section 11 of the new arbitration act alleging that the respondent no.2 had stopped making payment in full in accordance with the terms of the lease deeds dated 25-6-1992 and the two named arbitrators when approached had not taken active part in resolving the dispute and had not made any progress deliberately causing huge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1967 (HC)

K. Venkata Subbayya Vs. District Collector, Chittoor and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP381

..... chowdary is that although the high court of andhra is a successor court to the high court of madras created by royal charter, it is all the same not a high court established by royal charter and that under the states reorganisation act (act xxxvii of 1956), the jurisdiction of the then existing state of andhra was extended to the whole of the territories transferred to the state from the erstwhile state of hyderabad and therefore, article 183 can have no application to a decree by a high court not established by the royal charter.4. mr. n. ..... well to bear in mind that consequent on the reorganisation of state, the high court of andhra has been renamed as that the high court of andhra pradesh and its jurisdiction was extended over the telangana area of the erstwhile hyderabad state and as such is not a 'new state' as it is a state formed by the provisions of part ii of the states reorganisation act. ..... the andhra high court was constituted by section 28 of the andhra state act, 1953, with effect from 5-7-1954 and named as high court of andhra and its name was changed to high court of judicature, andhra pradesh, by the operation of the states reorganisation act and the jurisdiction and powers of the existing courts on the date of commencement of the act were ..... it lays down that the law in force in the territory of india immediately before the commencement of this constitution shall continue in force therein until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1998 (HC)

A.V. Amarnathan and Another Vs. Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Ka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1999Kant404; ILR1999KAR478; 2000(1)KarLJ205

..... under the state reorganisation act of 1956 ('s.r, act', for short) the new state of mysore was formed consisting of the territories of former states of mysore and coorg and certain territories of the state of madras and of former states of bombay and hyderabad.18. ..... under the andhra state act, 1953, the district of bellary, excluding the taluks of alur, adoni and rayadurg, was transferred to the state of mysore and under section 41 of that act the jurisdiction of the high court of mysore was extended to the transferred territory. ..... the parliament enacted the mysore state (alteration of name) act, 1973, which provides, inter alia, that the state of mysore shall be known as the state of karnataka. ..... act provided for the establishment of the high court for the new state of mysore and section 50 of the act abolished the high court of the former state of mysore, as from the appointed day (1st november, 1956).19. ..... in the former high court of mysore, between 26th january, 1950 and 1st november, 1956 and in the new high court of mysore (karnataka) between 1st november, 1956 and 16-7-1973, petitions under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution and cases withdrawn by the high court under article 228 of the constitution, were heard by division benches from whose decisions there was no appeal within the high court.26. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1958 (HC)

Surjuprasad Dwarkaprasad Gumashta Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ572Bom

..... section 59(1) provides : 'except as hereinafter provided, the high court at nagpur shall, as from that day, have no jurisdiction in respect of the territory transferred from the existing state of madhya pradesh to the new state of ..... then came the states reorganization act and this petition was transferred to the bombay high court under sub-section (2) of ..... rather a curious case where a matter was transferred under a corresponding section of the states reorganization act, s. ..... proceedings pending in the high court at nagpur or the high court of hyderabad immediately before the appointed day as are certified by the chief justice of that high court, having regard to the place of accrual of the cause of action and other circumstances, to be proceedings which ought to be heard and decided by the high court for the new state of bombay shall, as soon as may be after such certification, be transferred to the high court of bombay.' 4. ..... submission seems to be startling because apart from the provisions of the states reorganization act, the position under the constitution is perfectly ..... that article before its amendment, it gave parliament the power by law to extend the jurisdiction of a high court to any state specified in the first schedule other than the state in which the high court had its principal seat, and it is not disputed that at the date when the states reorganization act was passed, parliament had the power to extend the jurisdiction of the bombay high court, and what is urged by mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //