Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: states reorganisation act 1956 section 3 transfer of territory from hyderabad to andhra and alteration of name Page 4 of about 69 results (0.258 seconds)

Motor General Traders and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1983(2)SCALE513; (1984)1SCC222; [1984]1SCR594; 1984(16)LC6(SC)

..... on november 1,1956 under the states reorganisation act, 1956 with the merger of the area known as the telangana area, which formerly formed a part of the erstwhile state of hyderabad, with the territories of the state of andhra the new state of andhra pradesh came into existence. ..... the two grounds which persuaded this court not to strike down the impugned legislation in the above case as can be gathered from the above passage were (1) that the period under consideration was just five or six years after the passing of the states reorganisation act, 1956 and (2) that there was no adequate data to decide the question whether the impugned legislation did in fact make any hostile discrimination. ..... that contention was rejected by this court with the following observations at pages 274-275 :the laws in different portions of the new state of madhya pradesh were enacted by different legislatures, and under section 119 of the states reorganisation act all laws force are to continue until repealed or altered by the appropriate legislature. ..... in order however to pass the test of permissible classification two conditions must be fulfilled, namely, (i) that the classification must be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others left out of the group and (ii) that that differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question. .....

Bhola Paswan Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... provisions of bihar reorganization act, 2000 and section 23 thereof in the context of the presidential notification and also the judgment rendered in the case of sudharkar vithal kumbhare (supra) which dealt in similar circumstances resulting out of bifurcation and reorganization of the state of maharashtra, had found that the instant case is not a case of migration, rather it is a case resulting out of reorganization of the parent state and the petitioner has been born and brought up in bokaro and having enjoyed the benefits ..... entitled to derive benefits from the state of origin and not from the state to which he has ..... facts which have been stated herein above, the petitioner is entitled to be treated as the person belonging to the scheduled caste and to receive the certificate from the respondent. ..... from the facts which have been brought on record, it appears that the petitioner's father was an employee of the bokaro steel limited for the period 1971 to 2002 and retired from bokaro steel plant after creation of the state of ..... the petitioner thereafter completed his school education from bokaro and was also granted caste certificate for the scheduled caste 'dusadh' by the block development officer, chas, bokaro ..... as per the said communication and letters issued by the personnel, administrative reforms and rajbhasa department, government of jharkhand, scheduled caste / tribe person who has migrated from the state of origin to some other state for the purpose of seeking education .....

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

..... it is stated that in the year 1952, a legislature was created for delhi which functioned upto november 1,1956 when the government of part 'c' states act, 1951 was repealed by section 130 of the states' reorganisation act, 1956. ..... substantial changes were made by the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956 (hereinafter called 'the seventh amendment act'), which incorporated the recommendations of the states reorganisation commission and was to have effect in concert with the states reorganisation act, 1956. ..... , namely, whether the properties owned by the states which are situated within union territories are exempt from paying property taxes, was specifically answered in the affirmative in the sea customs case; the observations in this regard are part of the ratio decidendi of the case and having been re-affirmed by a constitution bench which was hearing a litigation inter parts in the apsrtc case, they constitute good law; (ii) the definition of 'state' provided in section 3(58) of the general clauses act, ..... the laccadive, minicoy and amindivi islands (alteration of names) act, 1973 changed the name of these islands to 'lakshadweep' but it continued to remain a union territory.79. ..... the respondents are the union of india and the states of andhra pradesh, gujarat, haryana, jammu & kashmir, kerala, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, orissa, punjab, rajasthan, tripura and west bengal. ..... following the announcement of the decision to transfer the capital of british india from calcutta to delhi. .....

Madappa Chidri Vs. Apparao and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1960Kant310; AIR1960Mys310; ILR1960KAR892

..... the plaintiff's appeal, in this case, which was pending in the high court of hyderabad on the appointed day, not having been certified by the chief justice of the hyderabad high court, as one which should be heard and decided by the high court of the new state of mysore, fell within the residuary provisions contained in section 65(2) of the states reorganisation act, and therefore, statutory stood transferred to the high court of andhra pradesh. (8) mr. ..... (9) under articles 2 and 3 of the constitution, parliament may, by law, admit into the union or establish new states and form new states and alter areas, boundaries and means of existing states. ..... transfer of proceedings to mysore high court--(1) except as hereinafter provided, neither the high court at bombay nor the high court at madras shall, as from the appointed day, have jurisdiction in respect of any territory transferred from the existing state of bombay or the state of madras, as the case may be, to the new state of mysore. ..... from that decree, the plaintiff appealed to the high court of hyderabad and when that appeal was still pending in the high court of hyderabad, there was the reorganisation of states which took place on november 1, 1956. ..... the high court of andhra pradesh took the view that the dismissal of the suit on the ground that it was brought in the name of the plaintiff as if he were a minor although he was a major could not be sustained. .....

Akhilesh Prasad Vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the right to fair compensation 5 1990 (2) scr8436 (1994) supp (1) scr7147 section 115 (7), states re-organization act, 1956; sections 69-70 madhya pradesh re-organization act, 2000; sections 74-75 uttar pradesh re-organization act, 2000; section 78, andhra pradesh re-organization act, 2014 8 and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013, by section 42 provides as follows: 42. ..... interestingly, the present case highlights an issue which conflates two issues: on the one hand, the determination of a community as a scheduled caste or a sched- uled tribe in relation to a certain specified area or territory, given that the area or territory has been determined by the constitution to be a unit of the state or union territory; the other is the reality of political divisions of states through bifurcation or 4 reorganisation (as the parliament has chosen to express it), which has been occa- sioned a number of times. ..... at the present moment, there are two sources for recruitment to the higher judicial service, namely, by promotion from amongst the members of the subordinate judicial service and by direct recruitment. .....

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... thinking that the government of mysore did not and could not make any adaptation or modification to the hyderabad act, the source of the power to make which is section 120 of the states reorganisation act.although that section empowers the appropriate government to make necessary adaptations and modifications, whether by way of repeal or amendment, such power is exercisable only for the purpose of facilitating the application of any law in relation to any of the states formed or territorially altered. ..... the judgment, his lordship states as follows:'the states reorganisation act by section 65 extended the jurisdiction of the high court of andhra pradesh to the telengana area and provided for the automatic transfer of all proceedings pending in the high court of hyderabad immediately before the appointed day other than those certified by the chief justice of that high court as proceedings transferrable to the bombay and the mysore high courts, to the high court of andhra pradesh and section 119 preserved the continuance ..... act, is the law referred to in that section; namely, a law which extends or applies to territories and contains territorial references; to such a law, section 119 may give provisional immunity from the consequences of territorial changes.but, no such provisional immunity could accrue from this section to the hyderabad act which was not a law of territorial extent or application and which would have been unaffected by mere territorial changes had only the hyderabad .....

Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1977MP116; 1977MPLJ227

..... by sub-section (2) of section 51 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 (37 of 1956), i, zakir hussain, president of india, after consultation with the governor of madhya pradesh and the chief justice of the high court of madhya pradesh, hereby establish a permanent bench of the madhya pradesh high court at gwalior and further direct that such being not less than two in number, as the chief justice may from time ..... state by separation of territory from any state or by uniting two or more states or parts of states or by uniting any territory to a part of any state; (b) increase the area of any state; (c) diminish the area of any state; (d) alter the boundaries of any state; (e) alter the name of any state; provided that no bill for the purpose shall be introduced in either house of parliament except on the recommendation of the president and unless, where the proposal contained in the bill affects the boundaries of any state or states specified in part a or part b of the first schedule or the name or names of any such state or ..... supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions which would include provisions relating to the setting up oi the legislative, executive and judicial organs of the state essential to the effective state administration under the constitution, expenditure and distribution of revenue, apportionment of assets and liabilities, provisions as to services, application and adaptation of laws, transfer of proceedings and other ..... of andhra pradesh, air .....

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

..... (b) if section 24 of the reorganisation act is read in proper perspective, an independent council, namely, chhattisgarh bar council came into existence from the appointed day and there being a deemed corporation, it must be given due weighment for the purpose of carrying it on to the ultimate logical end in its conceptual eventuality, as the same postulates a deemed fiction which has to be carried to a coherent conclusion. ..... council with an electorate exceeding five thousand but not exceeding ten thousand, twenty members, and in the case of a state bar council with an electorate exceeding ten thousand, twenty-five members, elected in accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote from amongst advocates on the electoral roll of the state bar council : provided that as nearly as possible one-half of such elected members shall, subject to any rules that may be made ..... i may hasten to add when the territorial jurisdiction is extended there is also extension of the term of the tribunal, body or university, but that cannot be extended to the persons who constitute the tribunal or the body, because by such extension an absurd situation comes into ..... in this context, i may profitably refer to the decision rendered in the case of chief justice of andhra pradesh and anr. .....

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble Chancellor, Jharkhand Sta ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR187(Jhr)]

..... according to the petitioner and others similarly situated, the state of jharkhand not having constituted the jharkhand state universities (constituent colleges) service commission, the state of jharkhand and the universities were obliged to honour the recommendations made by the bihar state universities service commission in view of its continuance in the eyes of law by virtue of section 66 of the reorganisation act and by virtue of the continued application of the bihar state universities (constituent colleges) service commission act, 1987 by operation of section 84 of the reorganisation act.4. ..... on 13.12.2000 by another order in exercise of powers under section 85 of the reorganisation act, the bihar state universities act, 1976 had been adapted by the state of jharkhand with the modifications indicated in that order including the name of the enactment which was changed into jharkhand state universities act, 2000. ..... 336 and 377 of 2003 were filed essentially praying for a direction to the state of jharkhand and the various universities in its territory to appoint candidates recommended by the service commission after quashing the order dated 10.9.2001 issued by the governor of jharkhand. ..... from 13.12.1997 to 30.10.2001, the interviews were held. .....

Mohd. Yaqub Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1971Delhi45a

..... ' successor state, to which there is a reference in sections 82 and 67, has been defined in section 2(m) of the punjab reorganisation act as meaning the state of punjab or haryana and includes the union territory of chandigarh and the transferred territory. ..... ), the word 'liability' as used in ss 87 and 88 of the states reorganisation act. ..... transferred territory has been defined in section 2(n) as meaning the territory which on the appointed day was transferred from the existing state of punjab to the union territory of himachal pradesh.12. ..... plea has further been taken that the employment of the employees of the electricity board constituted the liability of the electricity board and the same was liable to be apportioned between the successor states under sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 67 of the punjab reorganisation act. ..... (4) nothing in the preceding provisions of this section shall be construed as preventing the government of any of the successor states from constituting at any time on or after the appointed day, a state electricity board or a state warehousing corporation for that state under the provisions of the act relating to such board or corporation and if such a board or a corporation is so constituted in any of the successor states before the dissolution of the board or the corporation referred to in sub-section (1)- (a) provision may be made by order of the central government enabling the new board ..... 1956 came to be considered. .....