Skip to content


Statement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: statement Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.108 seconds)
Mar 24 1988 (TRI)

A.S. Periasamy, Proprietor, Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-24-1988

Reported in: (1988)(17)LC260Tri(Delhi)

..... of the appellant is that so far as the confessional statement of sivalingam is concerned this has been retracted and the ..... central excise records what is more periasamy admitted that the statement of sivalingam was correct appellant further offered to pay duty ..... is not a case of bland confessions and prompt retractions the statements made by periasamy and sivalingam are fully supported by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 1988 (HC)

Pradip Kumar Sarkar and ors. Vs. Luxmi Tea Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-06-1988

Reported in: [1990]67CompCas491(Cal)

..... view of the unassailable claim of the fourth petitioner to such shares by purchase no affidavit has been affirmed by the said madanlal agarwalla and the supposed application of madanlal agarwalla ..... the submission was that it involved only four shares 35 the company in its supplementary affidavit in opposition has referred to three cases where applications for transmission of shares were made .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 1988 (HC)

Equitable Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, G. Ward, an ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-19-1988

Reported in: (1988)73CTR(Cal)236,[1988]174ITR714(Cal)

..... into the records however the court cannot take into consideration the averments made in the affidavit in opposition filed which averments are not supported by the recorded reasons in this connection ..... department for convenience if the income tax officer disclosed further or additional reasons in his affidavit before the court which are not stated in the recorded reasons such further or additional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 1988 (HC)

Suraj Kund Temple and anr. Vs. Rama Kant and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-31-1988

Reported in: AIR1989HP59

..... the witness box and substantially supported the averments made in his affidavit he was also supported by said thakur dass wjjo also ..... the allegations of fact contained in such applications be verified by affidavit but merely because the word shall had been used therein cannot ..... on may 11 1972 by refiling it along with the supporting affidavit and under that impression he did not advise thakur dass the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1988 (HC)

Ramish Francis Toppo Vs. Violet Francis Toppo

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-22-1988

Reported in: AIR1989Cal128,(1989)1CALLT87(HC),1988(2)CHN241,93CWN165,1(1989)DMC322

..... that it was altogether undesirable and indeed contrary to established practice to accept evidence on affidavit specially evidence of the petitioner 17 it appears that even though under section 47 of ..... section nor any other section in the act makes similar provisions for the statements contained in the written statements of the respondent i am yet to understand the rationale behind this discrimination .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 1988 (HC)

Padinjarekara Agencies (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-08-1988

Reported in: (1988)71CTR(Ker)108; [1988]173ITR637(Ker)

..... made considerable profits and the shareholders received no dividends nor even statements of accounts and they had no beneficial interest in the ..... so also the appellate tribunal has totally ignored the uncontradicted statement of one of the major purchasers of the firm dingra ..... questions nos 60 and 64 and also in the sworn statement of anna abraham another managing partner in answer to question .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1988 (HC)

Surender Nath Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-25-1988

Reported in: AIR1988Delhi276; 1988(14)DRJ326

..... development authority has been filed it has been pleaded in this affidavit that it has been the practice of the delhi development authority ..... was rightly cancelled by the respondents it was asserted in the affidavit that there was no legal duty of the respondents to ..... chairman vide his order dated november 6 1981 in the counter affidavit the petitioner reiterated his pleas and mentioned that it is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 1988 (HC)

Andrew Simon King Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-05-1988

Reported in: 1988(3)Crimes33; 35(1988)DLT435

..... rejected the counsel s reference is to the endorsement made by this petitioner underneath the statement recorded under section 108 of the customs act the endorsement has already been noticed ..... through the endorsements made in capital words by the petitioner underneath each page of the statement the counsel has also shown us the endorsement whereby the petitioner acknowledged having received copies .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 1988 (HC)

Darshan Garg Vs. Sri Kishan Das

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-22-1988

Reported in: 36(1988)DLT3

..... in question after getting it vacated from the respondent rather the statement of the petitioner s husband who appeared as attorney of the ..... and he also did not care to give importance to the statement ofpetitioner s husband with regard to the necessity of having atleast ..... which swaran singh was occupying however it is mentioned in the affidavit that lal chand who was the second son ofthe respondent was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 1988 (HC)

Satish Bhardwaj Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-16-1988

Reported in: 1989(16)DRJ1

..... the residence of the petitioner were explained by him in his statement recorded under section 40 of the foreign exchange regulation act ..... upon by the detaining authority was an english translation of the statement of ashok kumar and that along with the grounds of ..... filed in the court this is highly objectionable particularly when the affidavit is filed by a responsible functionary of the court the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //