Stated Value - Judgment Search Results

State Bank of India Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

disputed before us that a suit was filed by the state bank of india against respondent no 3 praying for a

State Bank of India, Varanasi Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(1)AWC659

the amount in the head 0039 state excise however the state bank of india varanasi slept over the bank drafts for

State of Karnataka Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC3511; 2000(1)SCALE249; (2000)10SCC607

and mr n v ramana addl adv general for the state of andhra pradesh had taken note of this order for

State of Assam Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and ors.

Court: Guwahati

397 1 read with section 401 of the code as stated above the word person has not been defined in the the case of jogendra nath naskar v commr of income tax calcutta air 1969 sc 1089 the apex court explaining the

State Bank of India and Others Vs. State Bank of India Canteen Employe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000(85)FLR653]; JT2000(5)SC63; (2000)ILLJ1441SC; 2000(3)SCALE290; (2000)5SCC531; (2000)2UPLBEC1703

..... to be given because as stated in the award there are certain service conditions which can not be valued in terms of money ..... by passing the following order learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicants shall raise their dispute in the appropriate ..... circumstances canteen employees are not employees of bank it was stated that under the circumstances the functioning of the canteens and .....

State Govt. Houseless Harijan Employees Association Vs. State of Karna ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)792; 2000(8)SCALE281; [2000]Supp5SCR483; (2001)1UPLBEC313

additional grounds later brought out 49 besides what had been stated in the affidavit of the state respondents is the petitioner

State Election Commission Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)ALD456

of article 243 e to hold elections learned senior counsel stated that the scheme of the constitution of india as provided namely mandal parishad territorialconstituency and zilla parishad terrilorial constituency were added while replacing the three tier system elections to the mandal

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

really alleviate the situation earlier in this judgment i have stated that peculiarities are the characters of the rivers in this each state in each water year they will also furnish valuable data which may be of considerable importance in future f

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs. Karnataka St ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2000(3)KarLJ501

in the writ appeals which are as under the karnataka state road transport corporation for short the corporation filed the w appellant has an alternative remedy available under the bihar sales tax act 1959 however we do not subscribe to the view

Orissa State Road Transport Corporation Employees' Association of Unio ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (2001)ILLJ927Ori

the counter filed on behalf of the corporation it is stated that the petitioner as station master traffic inspector was getting