State Universities Act 2000 29 Of 2001 Section 62 - Judgment Search Results

Sachidananda K. and ors. Vs. Bangalore University and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1387; 2006(2)KarLJ216

of lecturers in the universities are governed by the karnataka state universities act 2000 and the guidelines issued by the university required for the appointment and career advancement of teachers in universities and institutions affiliated to it regulations 2000 for short the is violation of any requirements of section 55 of the act in making the selection and appointment in the present case provisions of section 53 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and the university grants commission minimum qualification required for the of the karnataka state universities act 2000 karnataka act no 29 of 2001 and the provisions of the university grants commission karnataka state universities act 2000 karnataka act no 29 of 2001 and the provisions of the university grants commission minimum qualification the selection and the appointments he has relied on sub sections 4 6 7 and 8 of section 53 to contend

Amruthes N.P. S/O Late N.C. Puttaswamy Vs. Principal Secretary to Chan ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(4)AIRKarR183; 2008(6)KLJ562; 2008(3)KCCR1927

purpose of appointing a vice chancellor of the university the state government shall constitute a search committee consisting of four persons provisions contained in section 14 3 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 3 this writ petition is liable to be contained in section 14 3 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 3 this writ petition is liable to be dismissed to section 14 2 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the act for the purpose of dated 23 1 2008 and mem 45 a 2008 dated 29 1 2008 submitted by the petitioner vide annexures a f today karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 14 3 cyriac joseph c j mrs b v karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 14 3 cyriac joseph c j mrs b v nagarathna

Prof. S.N. Hegde Vs. the Lokayukta and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3892; 2004(3)KarLJ505

as well as the professor in the university because the state government in consultation with the lokayukta has issued a notification under section 14 7 and 8 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 by appointing a judge of the high court short referred to as the act the karnataka state universities act hereinafter for short referred to as the universities act being well as the provisions of the karnataka state universities act 2000 the karnataka state universities act 1976 did provide for an honorarium the fourth respondent alleged in the syndicate meeting dated 29 7 2002 that the petitioner had unauthorisedly guided 41 students of natural justice having regard to the provisions contained in sections 9 11 12 the procedure for conducting investigation under section the thing to be done are called directory see page 62 of craies on statute law 1971 edition in addition to

T.T.L. Trusts, T.T.L. Collage of Business Management (Post Graduate Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ251; 2008(4)KCCR2351; 2008(4)AIRKarR534; AIR2008NOC2295

under the provisions of the aicte act and the karnataka state universities act 2000 the university has no role in the to 60 in terms of section 59 of the karnataka universities act 2000 by letter dated 5 10 2005 at annexure and 13 of section 59 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and also to approve the admissions of all the costs constitution intake section 59 of the karnataka universities act 2000 act petitioner was running post graduate institute all india council petition allowed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 59 18 b v nagarathna j admission to allowed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 59 18 b v nagarathna j admission to m of syndicate that university has power to fix intake under section 59 of 2000 act is incorrect seats in take to

H.C. Mallaiah and anr. Vs. Bangalore University and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3392; 2007(5)KarLJ650; 2007(4)KCCR2318; 2007(4)AIRKarR121; 2007(5)AIRKarR255

the other hand submits that the provisions in the karnataka state universities act 2000 for short the act relating to the other hand submits that the provisions in the karnataka state universities act 2000 for short the act relating to the teachers hand submits that the provisions in the karnataka state universities act 2000 for short the act relating to the teachers viz submits that the provisions in the karnataka state universities act 2000 for short the act relating to the teachers viz the in section 2 12 of the act is as under section 2 12 reads as under 2 definitions in this act

Ranchi University Grade-iv Staff Association and anr. Vs. State of Jha ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR248; [2005(105)FLR244]; [2005(1)JCR479(Jhr)]

and creation of the successor state of jharkhand the bihar state universities act 1976 continued to hold the field subsequently it in the case of teaching non teaching employees of the universities constituent colleges 60 years being the age of superannuation fixed of the successor state of jharkhand the bihar state universities act 1976 continued to hold the field subsequently it was adopted against the statutory provisions of section 67 of the act 2000 motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59 1988 section noticed that 60 years of age has been prescribed under section 67 of the jharkhand state universities amendment act 2002 while prior to commencement of the act 1976 15th august 1976 62 years the age prescribed for retirement higher education department of

Dr. Vidyanand Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1817; [2007(3)JCR385(Jhr)]

his letter no 527 dated 10th february 2004 5 the state government thereafter issued the impugned notification no 3 misc 18 these guidelines and instructions are accepted and implemented by various universities and other organizations there is nothing on the record to present case there is no such discrimination and thus the action of the respondents cannot be said to be arbitrary or birsa agricultural university is creation of jharkhand agricultural universities act 2000 this university was established under section 3 of the aforesaid of the fund of the university are mentioned under section 29 besides the income from fees grants donations etc one of act section 8 prescribes the authority of the university whereas section 9 prescribes constitution of the board of management the chief july 2005 got extension in retirement age from 60 to 62 years since the petitioners had already retired before the date

P. M. Parameshwaramurthy and Others Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Prin ...

Court : Karnataka

..... university keeping in view the scope of section 17 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and the plenary powers under section ..... have submitted the thesis before 31 10 2001 within the aforesaid period no thesis was ..... interference with the decision appointing such person 29 yet another judgment of the supreme court ..... cannot be subjected to such market forces 62 when this report was placed before the .....

Karnataka International Educational Trust (Regd.) Vs. the Bangalore Un ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4738; 2009(4)KarLJ320; AIR2009NOC2078

..... has been granted by the ncte under section 14 6 of the act every university is obliged to grant affiliation to such institution karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 grant of affiliation s abdul nazeer ..... field it is not open to the state government to refuse permission relying on a state act or policy consideration it has been held as under 62 from the above decisions in our judgment .....

Hanumanth Ballappa Ilager Vs. the Karnataka University, by Its Registr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR946

on sub section 2 of section 77 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and the law laid down by this sub section 2 of section 77 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 as pointed out by the learned counsel for section 10 4 a or 10 1 c of the act held the proceedings under section 33 2 b and the writ petition stands disposed of a karnataka state universities act 2000 section 77 2 are mandatory provisions of the act and before the registrar evaluation of the 1st respondent university on 29th december 2003 at 3 p m in his chambers iii for which examination was held in the month of april 2001 his registration number was 4839 when he was writing the proceedings under section 33 2 b and the proceedings under section 10 4 a ore reference made under section 10 1 regard to even domestic enquiries further the proviso to section 62 2 of the state universities act must be complied with