State Universities Act 2000 29 Of 2001 Section 62 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: state universities act 2000 29 of 2001 section 62 Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 366 results (1.684 seconds)Amruthes N.P. S/O Late N.C. Puttaswamy Vs. Principal Secretary to Chan ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-11-2008
Reported in : 2008(4)AIRKarR183; 2008(6)KLJ562; 2008(3)KCCR1927
the provisions contained in section 14 3 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 3 this writ petition is liable to provisions contained in section 14 3 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 3 this writ petition is liable to be according to section 14 2 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 hereinafter referred to as the act for the purpose committee within one month from today karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 14 3 cyriac joseph dated 23 1 2008 and mem 45 a 2008 dated 29 1 2008 submitted by the petitioner vide annexures a f today karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 14 3 cyriac joseph c j mrs b v merit of the contention of the petitioner 4 according to section 14 2 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.T.L. Trusts, T.T.L. Collage of Business Management (Post Graduate Co ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-11-2008
Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ251; 2008(4)KCCR2351; 2008(4)AIRKarR534; AIR2008NOC2295
sections 12 and 13 of section 59 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and also to approve the admissions of anything more except reiterating that the quality and excellence of universities and educational institutions mainly rests on the persons who man constitution intake section 59 of the karnataka universities act 2000 act petitioner was running post graduate institute all india council for deserves to be quashed petition allowed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 59 18 b v petition allowed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 59 18 b v nagarathna j admission to allowed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 59 18 b v nagarathna j admission to m m in accordance with sub sections 12 and 13 of section 59 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 and also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka International Educational Trust (Regd.) Vs. the Bangalore Un ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-17-2008
Reported in : ILR2008KAR4738; 2009(4)KarLJ320; AIR2009NOC2078
..... has been granted by the ncte under section 14 6 of the act every university is obliged to grant affiliation to such institution karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 grant of affiliation s abdul nazeer ..... field it is not open to the state government to refuse permission relying on a state act or policy consideration it has been held as under 62 from the above decisions in our judgment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. M. Venkataramanappa Vs. the Chancellor, Bangalore University and o ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-04-2008
Reported in : ILR2008KAR2013; 2008(4)KarLJ3;
dismissed without there being any order as to costs karnataka state universities act 2000 section 8 discipline inspection and control chancellor entirely distinct and different writ appeal is dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 8 chidananda view the scope of sections 8 and 9 of the act it is necessary to examine the fact situation in the being any order as to costs karnataka state universities act 2000 section 8 discipline inspection and control chancellor exercising powers under at controversy 8 though the chancellor in his communication dated 29 3 2003 issued certain directions to the vice chancellor but dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 section 8 chidananda ullal h n nagamohan das jj discipline for the appellant that the chancellor by exercising power under section 8 of the act issued directions to the university in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences by Its Registrar, Dr. S. Va ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2008
Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ656:2009(2)KCCR1420:AIR2009NOC2333(D.B)
gandhi university act or section 2 12 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 therefore we do not see any relevancy of teachers under section 2 12 of the karnataka state universities act 10 only to test the status of the institution and also section 21 2 and section 30 of the actsection 2 e health sciences means modern scientific medicine in all or section 2 12 of the karnataka state universities act 2000 therefore we do not see any relevancy in the contention time basis in a college or institution of health science section 2 n teachers of the university means persons appointed for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJharkhand Rajya Vishwavidyalaya Awam Mahavidyalaya Karmchari Sangh and ...
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Mar-10-2008
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR471(Jhr)]
the legislative history of section 67 a of the bihar state universities act 1976 is as follows i the original section give such a declaration with reference to the jharkhand state universities amendment act 2002 as the prayer becomes infructuous on account sixty two years this provision has been amended by amendment act 3 of 1990 by substitution of section 67 a under service according to the statutory provisions prior to the amendment 2000 the age of superannuation of non teaching employees was 62 said point in these writ petitions the legislative history of section 67 a of the bihar state universities act 1976 is be the date on which he attains the age of 62 years provided that the university shall in no case extend
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopeshwar Gope, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Mar-10-2008
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR587a(Jhr)]
petitioners when the age of superannuation of teaching staff the state should also raise the age of superannuation of non teaching the legislative competence to make necessary amendments in jharkhand state universities act 2000 and such action is neither unreasonable nor arbitrary the issuance of direction declaring jharkhand state universities amendment act act 05 2005 published in the jharkhand gazette extra ordinary dated whereunder section 67 a of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 has been amended providing age of retirement to be 62 3 2007 subsequently by another letter no 5 b2 03 2001 356 of the secretary to the government department of human retirement of teaching staff accordingly by the amending act 2005 section 67 a has been amended 13 it is mainly contended retirement of teachers has been enhanced from 60 years to 62 years whereas retirement of non teaching employees has been allowed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurya Mohan Prasad Vs. Vinoba Bhave University and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Apr-03-2008
Reported in : [2008(3)JCR9(Jhr)]
of 42 years of service section 67 of the jharkhand state university act clearly envisages that non teaching employees of the issued in violation of section 67 of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 which prescribes 60 years as the age of also be entitled to all the consequential benefits motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59 1988 section 166 a k violation of section 67 of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 which prescribes 60 years as the age of retirement for petitioner the aforesaid orders have been issued in violation of section 67 of the jharkhand state universities act 2000 which prescribes
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBidirambika Vidya SamsThe Rep. by Its Secretary Sri N.B. Kantharaj Vs. ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-11-2008
Reported in : 2009(1)KarLJ365; ILR2008(3)Kar3766; 2008(4)AIRKarR537; AIR2008NOC2294
extension of such facilities cannot be found fault with the state government on account of several constraints has been depending upon hence no merit in petition and accordingly dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 no merit in petition and accordingly dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 mrs merit in petition and accordingly dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 mrs b universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 mrs b v nagarathna j establishment of new pre university dismissed karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 mrs b v nagarathna j establishment of karnataka state universities act 2000 k a no 29 2001 sections 64 29 mrs b v nagarathna j establishment of new
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Hausila Prasad Sharma Vs. Chancellor Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapit ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-22-2008
Reported in : [2008(117)FLR269]
held court cannot issue a writ of mandamus directing the state authorities to acquire a particular land land acquisition is not under section 31 3 b of the u p state universities act 1973 the act 2 a meeting of executive council directing acquisition of land under the provisions of land acquisition act 1894 it would however be open to the court in filed a representation before the chancellor which was rejected on 29 7 1997 hence the present writ petition 3 we have is ineligible or is not entitled to be appointed under sections 31 3 b of the act then they will also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT