Stat - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: stat Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 2,302 results (0.307 seconds)Hiralal Ambalal Vs. Manilal Maganlal
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-19-1925
Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR517; 94Ind.Cas.645
norman macleod kt c j 1 this appeal raises an interesting question regarding the liability of persons who pass surety...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPurna Chandra Chatterjee Vs. Narendra Nath Chowdhury
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-06-1925
Reported in: (1925)ILR52Cal894
is settled law that in construing the words of a statute one must give to them their plain grammatical natural and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEastern Mortgage and Agency Co., Ltd., and T.C. Tweedie Vs. Muhammad F ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-23-1925
Reported in: (1925)ILR52Cal914
estate of the plaintiff and the defendant no 5 he stated further that the defendants nos 1 to 4 were bound
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRobertson Vs. Railroad Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1925
..... the court transportation act feb 28 1920 c 91 310 par a 41 stat 456 472 authorizes the railroad labor board for the efficient administration of the ..... one instance the credit mobilier act march 3 1873 c 226 4 17 stat 485 509 it was provided that writs of subpoena to bring in ..... years authority was granted generally by act sept 19 1922 c 345 42 stat 849 to institute a civil suit by or on behalf of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarroll Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-1925
..... u s 153 appropriation act of march 2 1917 c 146 39 stat 969 970 automobiles used in introducing or attempting to introduce intoxicants ..... duties on imports and tonnage approved march 3 1815 c 94 3 stat 231 232 these and similar acts definitely empowered officers to seize ..... to the national prohibition act approved november 23 1921 c 134 42 stat 222 223 provides that any officer agent or employee of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTToyota Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-25-1925
..... intended in those cases to eliminate the distinction made in rev stats 2169 based on color or race but like earlier acts using ..... in the act shall repeal or in any way enlarge rev stats 2169 except as specified in the seventh subdivision of this act ..... citizens of the philippine islands were not eligible to naturalization under rev stats 2169 because not aliens and therefore not within its terms p .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwiss National Ins. Co., Ltd. Vs. Miller
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-02-1925
..... with the enemy act approved june 5 1920 c 241 41 stat 977 the plaintiff became expressly entitled to the recovery sought the ..... legislative construction disclosed by paragraph 11 adopted march 4 1923 42 stat 1511 1513 c 285 11 a partnership association or other unincorporated ..... technical state of war until july 2 1921 chapter 40 42 stat 105 they reveal the desire of the executive departments for prompt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWork Vs. Louisiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-23-1925
..... an act of 1824 footnote 3 act of march 3 1849 c 108 9 stat 395 creating the department of the interior footnote 4 act of june 25 1910 ..... plaintiff s rights under the acts of march 2 1849 9 stat 352 and september 28 1850 9 stat 519 to the end that evidence of title may be given ..... under the acts of march 2 1849 c 87 9 stat 352 and september 28 1850 c 84 9 stat 519 a motion by the secretary to dismiss the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Village of Hubbard, Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-05-1925
..... thereto prior to that of act june 18 1910 c 309 36 stat 539 552 is there any specific reference to electric railroads the ..... railroads footnote 5 the act of june 18 1910 c 309 36 stat 539 551 552 provided that the commission shall not establish any through ..... of a different character footnote 6 transportation act 1920 c 91 41 stat 456 enlarged in several respects the powers of the commission and dealt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMorrison Vs. Work
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-05-1925
..... of the court by the act of january 14 1889 c 24 25 stat 642 and agreements made pursuant thereto approved by the president march 4 1890 ..... 2 of the general allotment act of february 8 1887 c 119 24 stat 388 the plaintiff does not claim to be entitled to an allotment of ..... by this proceeding under the act of february 6 1901 c 217 31 stat 760 any indian who claims to be entitled to an allotment under any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial