Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC545REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.115 OF2004GENE CAMPAIGN & ANOTHER PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.840 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NO.4086 OF2006CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.295 OF2007IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.6 OF2016IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 Writ Petition (Civil) No.115 of 2004 Etc. Page 1 of 260 JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 4 Preface: ................................................................................................................................ 7 Birds eye view of the controversy: ............................................................................. 9 Pleadings: ............................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC677IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2284-2285 of 2023 (@SLP (Criminal) Nos. 8939-8940 of 2023) V. SENTHIL BALAJI ...APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2288-2289 of 2023 (@SLP (Criminal) Nos. 8652-8653 of 2023) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.__2286 of 2023 (@SLP (Criminal) No.7437/2023) CRIMINAL APPEAL No._2287__of 2023 (@SLP (Criminal) No.7460/2023) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.________2290_______of 2023 (@SLP (Criminal) No.8750/2023) JUDGMENT M.M. SUNDRESH, J.1. Leave granted.2. After the Scheduled Offence went through an elongated judicial journey, it is the turn of the Enforcement Case Information Report under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the PMLA, 2002). 1 What is under challenge before us are the orders passed by the majority of the Judges when a reference was made on a difference of opinion by the Division Bench of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8129 of 2022 Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited Appellant Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents With Civil Appeal No.8130 of 2022 And with Civil Appeal No.8131 of 2022 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI This judgment consists of the following sections: A. Facts .................................................................................................................. 4 B. Submissions .................................................................................................... 15 1 C. Issues .............................................................................................................. 19 D. Requirement of security clearance for renewal of permission ......................... 21 E. Judicial Review on procedural grounds ........................................................... 26 E. 1 Principles of natural justice: purpose and content....................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.889 of 2007 Arup Bhuyan .. Appellant Versus State of Assam & Anr. .. Respondents With Review Petition (Criminal) No.417/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 With Review Petition (Criminal) No.426/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.889/2007 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5971/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5964/2019 With Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 2 With SLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.16637/2014 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5643/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6270/2019 JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Present reference to the larger Bench is made against the judgment and order in the case of Arup Bhuyan vs. Union of India, (2011) 3 SCC377as well as State of Kerala vs. Raneef, (2011) 1 SCC784 pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 26.08.2014, reported as (2015) 12 SCC702 Background of the Reference 2. That the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Raneef (supra) wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.4634 OF2014VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28394 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28922 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.29273 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.............OF2022(@ DIARY No.41063 OF2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.9987 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.10018 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.10019 OF20152 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.993 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.150 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.151-157 OF2016WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.152 OF2016SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.11839 OF2019SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2890 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.5487 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1269 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1270 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1271-1272 O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No../2022 (arising out of SLP(Crl.) No../2022 @ Diary No.34207/2018) ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI . APPELLANT versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT1 There is a delay of 216 days in filing of this special leave petition against the judgment and order dated 5.10.2017 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad1 in Criminal Revision Application No.205/2014. Even though the explanation offered in the application for condonation of delay is blissfully vague and bereft of any material facts and particulars, keeping in mind the 1 for short, the High Court 2 subject matter involved, we deemed it appropriate to ignore/condone the delay and proceeded to hear the matter on merits.2. We must note that the respondents had faintly objected to the hearing of this matter on merits owing to unexplained delay in filing of the petition. However, they have a serious objection to the joining of Ms. Teesta S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5233 0F2012NEDUMPILLI FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5230 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5190 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5191 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5184 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5241 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5185 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5111 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5188 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5187 OF20121 CIVIL APPEAL No.5183 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5113 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO.3857 OF2022(@Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8331 of 2015) TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) No.359 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL No.5186 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5192 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5189 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5112 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5232 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5231 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5234 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5237 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5238 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5315 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1878618787 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.1324 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL No.7836 OF201...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3123 of 2020 DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3124 of 2020 SANJEET SHUKLA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3133 of 2020 KRISHNAJI DATTATRAYA MORE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3134 of 2020 MADHUSHRI NANDKISHOR JETHLIYA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3131 of 2020 DEVENDRA ROOPCHAND JAIN & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3129 of 2020 KAMALAKAR SUKHDEO DARODE @ DARWADE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.915 of 2020 DESHMUKH ESHA GIRISH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2021[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.12489/2020]. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PEARL BEVERAGES LTD. RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Leave granted.2. An accident, which took place on 22.11.2007 involving a car (a Porsche) belonging to the respondent-Company, which was insured with the appellant, has resulted in this appeal against the Order by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC for short). The car was completely damaged. The appellant 1 repudiated the claim by the respondent. The question which arises in this Appeal is, whether the NCDRC is correct in holding that the appellant is not entitled to invoke the shield of Clause (2c) of the Contract of Insurance, under which, it was not liable, if the person driving the vehicle, was under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or drugs. The State Commission rejected the complaint of the re...
Tag this Judgment!