Court : Chennai
(Prayers: W.P. No.1215 of 2015 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration of the decision of the Peace Committee Meeting held on 12.1.2015 at Namakkal, Namakkal District in respect of the novel Madhorubagan written by Perumal Murugan under the Chairmanship of District Revenue Officer, Namakkal District, the 3rd respondent as null and void and ultra vires Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution of India. W.P. No.20372 of 2015 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 4 and 5 to forfeit all the copies of the book titled Madhorubagan written in Tamil by the 1st respondent and its translated English version titled One Part Woman printed, published, circulated, offered for sale and sold in various formats, i.e. in print media and electronic media by the 2nd and 3rd respondents respectively. Crl. O.P. Nos.7086 and 7153 of 2015 : Petitions filed under ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.34 of 2015:- Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C, praying to set aide the order, dated 02.12.2014, made in C.M.P.No.2717 of 2014 in D.V.No.7 of 2014, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur. in Crl.R.C.No.43 of 2015:- Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C, praying to set aide the order, dated 02.12.2014, made in C.M.P.No.1291 of 2014 in D.V.No.7 of 2014, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.) 1. Crl.R.C.No.34 of 2015, is against the order, dated 08.01.2015, C.M.P.No.1291 of 2014 in D.V.No.7 of 2014, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, by which, the petition filed by wife/mother, under Section 21 of the Domestic Violence Act, to grant interim custody of the minor child, Sanjana to her, till the disposal of the main petition, has been allowed. 2. Crl.R.C.No.43 of 2015, is against the order, dated 02.12.2014, C.M.P.No.2717 of 2014 in D.V.No.7 of 2014, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in proceedings Nil, dated 11.06.2010 and subsequent notion in proceedings Na.Ka.2297/A2/2010, dated 29.07.2010 and quash the same, as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction.O R D E R1. Challenge in this writ petition, is to the competence of a Block Medical Officer, who exercised the power under the Tamil Nadu Public Health Act, 1939, and other provisions of the Act, and closed down a Hospital, named "Get Well", Tirukoilur. The Hospital, where treatment was given, began unwell on 11.06.2010, when it was found difficult in meeting out certain defects, alleged to be violations and consequently, sealed. Another proceeding impugned in this writ petition is to the order, rejecting the request of the petitioner to open the hospital.2. According to the petitioner, he has completed bachelor of Homeopathy Medicine and Surg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
WP 21933/2011:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned notification issued by the first respondent in GSR No.218(E) published in Gazette of India Extraordinary Part II-Section 3-Sub-section (i) dated 16.3.2011 in so far as it relates to item No.(i), i.e., Gatifloxacin formulation of systemic use in human by any route including oral and injectable and direct the respondents to review the prohibition after giving an opportunity to the petitioner.WP 25442/2011:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned notification issued by the first respondent in GSR No.218(E) published in Gazette of India Extraordinary Part II-Section 3-Sub-section (i) No.139, dated 16.3.2011 and to quash the same in so far as it relates to ite...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1997)ILLJ170Mad
Janarthanam, J.1. Certain events and incidents, which formed the backdrop and setting of the present actions - Writ Appeal No. 332 of 1994 and Writ Petitions Nos. 3124, 3125 and 3917 of 1993 better it is, we feel, to relate to have a proper understanding and fine grasp, with ease and grace - of the legal implications or positions to be derived or to flow from the factual matrix, giving rise to certain issues - so moot and complicated in nature - with which, we are now called upon to decide, by giving our anxious consideration. E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited (for short,'the employer') has one of its units located at Ranipet in the State of Tamil Nadu, where sanitary ware, superphospate and insecticides are manufactured. Some of its retired employees filed applications under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act No. 14 of 1947 - for, short, 'the I.D. Act'), before the Labour Court, Madras, claiming pension by alleging that pay ability of pension was a condition of servi...
Tag this Judgment!