Skip to content


Specified User - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: specified user Page 1 of about 18 results (0.015 seconds)
Feb 26 2002 (HC)

Perali Water User Association, Guntur and anr. Vs. Government of Andhr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT636

is supplied for the irrigation of one or more crops specified by the Irrigation Officer, the right to use such water Minister to examine the representation of the President, Perali Water Users Association and to take necessary action to issue permission for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2003 (TRI)

Magnet Users Association Vs. Designated Authority

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT150TriDel

that this characteristic is taken note of in the various specifications including Indian Standards Specification. Learned Counsel also pointed out that is removed, much of the difficulty faced by the magnet users would be removed.4. The ring magnet in question is an

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 2003 (TRI)

Magnet Users Association Vs. Ministry of Finance Designated

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC602

taken note of in the various specifications including Indian Standards Specification. Learned Counsel also pointed out that the submission of the is removed, much of the difficulty faced by the magnet users would be removed.4. The ring magnet in question is an

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1998 (HC)

Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu, Maddulaparva Village, Krishna ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(5)ALD238

to the facts of this case. The petitioner is Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu in Maddulaparva village. In its representation dated 7-8-1998

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2004 (TRI)

Highway Users' Centres (i) Ltd. Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of I ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2005)60SCL164SAT

1. The appeal is taken up with the consent of parties. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 21 1992 (HC)

Bombay Telephone Users' Association and others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom194; 1992(3)BomCR139

direction dated 10th June, 1992 under which in respect of specified Electronic Exchanges the calls will be metered and charged at

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2012 (HC)

Abp Private Limited Vs. Media Research Users Council

Court: Kolkata

and is applicable qua-user and only when the right of user is exercised will the clause be applicable. Reliance is placed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2001 (FN)

Department of Interior Vs. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

the documents would itself impair the Department's performance of a specific fiduciary obligation to protect the confidentiality of communications with tribes.5 Plan (Plan) to provide water allocations among competing uses and users, the Department asked the Klamath and other Indian Tribes (Basin

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 2007 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Highway Users' Centres (India)

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

and make repayment to the existing investors in the manner specified in Regulation 73.3.10 To sum up, all the companies/ entities Ltd. through unsecured loans represented in both the company's accounts.Highway Users Centres (India) Ltd. has transferred an amount of Rs. 1053.00

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2012 (HC)

Narayan Das Shukla and ors. Vs. Water Users Association,singhpur and o ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

being aggrieved by the order 13-5-2002 passed by the Water Users Association, Singhpur, District Shahdol, whereby the petitioneRs.request to permit them

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //