Specified User - Judgment Search Results

Bombay Telephone Users' Association and others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom194; 1992(3)BomCR139

dependupon the distance between the telephone exchanges to which the calling and the called telephones are connected as specified by the Telegraph authorities from time to time. This part of the rule has now been amended. As

Perali Water User Association, Guntur and anr. Vs. Government of Andhr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT636

more crops:- Where water from an irrigation system is supplied for the irrigation of one or more crops specified by the Irrigation Officer, the right to use such water shall be deemed to continue only until such … ORDERBACKGROUND FACTS 1. The petitioners 2 to 52 are members of the first petitioner association (Perali Water Users Association No.130) and they are ayacutdars of irrigation channel called P.T.Channel which is part of Krishna Western Delta

Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu, Maddulaparva Village, Krishna ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(5)ALD238

of the aforementioned principles, let me now refer to the facts of this case. The petitioner is Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu in Maddulaparva village. In its representation dated 7-8-1998 submitted to the Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Machilipatnam,

Magnet Users Association Vs. Designated Authority

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT150TriDel

of anti-dumping duty. Learned Counsel further pointed out that this characteristic is taken note of in the various specifications including Indian Standards Specification. Learned Counsel also pointed out that the submission of the domestic industry engaged in … 1. This appeal of M/s. Magnet Users Association is directed against the Customs Notification No. 123/2001-Cus., dated 12-12-2001 and Final Findings dated 23rd October, 2001

Magnet Users Association Vs. Ministry of Finance Designated

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC602

of anti-dumping duty. Learned Counsel further pointed out that this characteristic is taken note of in the various specifications including Indian Standards Specification. Learned Counsel also pointed out that the submission of the domestic industry engaged in … 1. This appeal of M/s Magnet Users Association is directed against the Custom Notification No. 123/2001-Cus dated 12.12.2001 and Final Findings dated 23rd October 2001

Highway Users' Centres (i) Ltd. Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of I ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2005)60SCL164SAT

1. The appeal is taken up with the consent of parties. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.4.03 directing the appellant to wind up the existing scheme and to refund the money collected...

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

with the constitution of the Selection Committee to recommend Members, while the functions of the Central Commission are specified in Section 79 of the said Act. Section 80 of the said Act provides for establishment of a … INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.14697 of 2015 REPORTABLE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ….Appellants versus UTILITY USERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ….Respondents With C.A. No.13451/2015 T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016

Narayan Das Shukla and ors. Vs. Water Users Association,singhpur and o ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

W.P.No.3874 / 2002 (Narayan Das Shukla & others ..Vs..Water Users Association, Singhpur, District Shahdol & another) 07-08-2012 Shri Brijesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.None for the respondents.

Abp Private Limited Vs. Media Research Users Council

Court: Kolkata

HON’BLE JUSTICE PATHERYA G.A.No.3966 of 2008 G.A.No.3729 of 2008 C.S.No.242 of 2008 ABP Private Limited versus Media Research Users Council FOR THE PLAINTIFF/ PETITIONER : Mr.Anindya Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Tilak Bose, Adv.Mr.Anubhav Sinha, Adv.Mr.Soumitra Datta, Adv.FOR THE DEFENDANT/ RESPONDENT

Sebi Vs. Highway Users' Centres (India)

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

release dated November 26, 1997. In the said Press release dated November 26, 1997, it was inter alia specified that "While the regulations for mutual fund schemes have been notified by SEBI, regulations for collective investment schemes … 1.1 M/s Highway Users' Centres (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the company) is a company registered under the provisions of the