Something - Judgment Search Results

inspecting Assistant Vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

..... idea of once for all payment and enduring benefit are not to be treated as something akin to statutory conditions nor are the notions of capital or revenue a judicial fetish .....

Bombay Bag Factory Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)LC114Tri(Delhi)

..... shopkeeper will not offer him a brief case or a suitcase but will offer him something different therefore it is difficult to accept that the registration certificate comprehends brief cases also .....

Kashi Nath Tapuriah Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

s k chattopadhayaya j 1 the petitioner kashinath tapuriah the chairman of m s incab industries ltd has impugned the...

Lataben Vs. Rajyaguru, Administrative Officer and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1997)1GLR720

s k keshote j 1 sufferings of the petitioner despite the fact that this court on 29 1 1982 decided...

Des Raj S/O Ram Sarup Vs. the State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1996CriLJ2720

p k jain j 1 this revision is directed against the judgment dated 17 11 1995 passed by the additional...

Surendra ElvIn Ali Vs. Smt. Maureen Ali

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: I(1996)DMC469

..... on the grounds that she herself was earning about rs 2000 and was also earning something from private tuitions she was to maintain herself and two children residing with her the .....

Mahabir Enterprises and Another Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1996KAR1632

..... word product it is at once clear that to be a product it must be something that is brought forth either naturally or as a result of effort and work apart .....

Mysore thermo Electric (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1996KAR2605; [1996]221ITR504(KAR); [1996]221ITR504(Karn); 1996(41)KarLJ242

..... assessee s learned advocate however submitted that the deeming provision of s 41 1 is something that is sacrosanct and that therefore the court cannot go beyond what has been clearly ..... court in motilal ambaidas vs vs cwt 1966 59itr767 sc love vs 41 1 is something that is sacrosanct and that therefore the court cannot go beyond what has been clearly .....

Bridge and Roof and Co. (India) Ltd. and Union of India (Uoi) Vs. K.K. ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1996)2CALLT269(HC)

bhagabati prasad banerjee j 1 these two appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 20th july 1987...

M.D.K. Ramalingam (Died) and Five ors. Vs. M.D.K. Thirumalaiappan and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1996(1)CTC741

orderthanikkachalam j 1 this civil revision is directed against the order passed in e a no 543 of 1995 in...