Skip to content


Sole - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: sole Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 316 results (0.218 seconds)
Nov 14 2012 (TRI)

Subhash Jewellery, Represented by C.V. Dayanandan Sole Proprietor Vs. ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Nov-14-2012

..... know the workmanship the society is not competent to apply for sole ownership it is a devotional work and cannot be commercialized nor ..... the opponents case the society is not competent to apply for sole ownership the opponent has mentioned the names of c v jayachandran ..... geographical indication 28 we could have allowed the appeal on the sole ground that the application has not been properly filed but we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2012 (HC)

indus Engineering Co. a Sole Proprietary Firm Through Its Proprietor I ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-25-2012

1 the petitioners claimants have challenged impugned award dated 27 january 2009 passed by the sole arbitrator appointed in view of the arbitration clause provided in the agreement pertaining to the ..... agreed time there arose dispute this arbitration proceedings to resolve the same 3 the first sole arbitrator resigned on 19 may 2006 the present learned arbitrator entered upon the reference on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2012 (HC)

R.H. Laboratories and Another Vs. Rajiv Mukul Sole Prop

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-10-2012

..... the trade mark omeezy the plaintiff had claimed in the plaint that it was a sole proprietorship firm with name and style m s zee laboratory and carrying of its manufacturing ..... part arises explanation 8212 a corporation shall be deemed to carry on business at its sole or principal office in india or in respect of any cause of action arising at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2012 (HC)

indus Engineering Co. a Sole Proprietary Firm Through Its Proprietor I ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-25-2012

1 the petitioners claimants have challenged impugned award dated 27 january 2009 passed by the sole arbitrator appointed in view of the arbitration clause provided in the agreement pertaining to the ..... agreed time there arose dispute this arbitration proceedings to resolve the same 3 the first sole arbitrator resigned on 19 may 2006 the present learned arbitrator entered upon the reference on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2012 (TRI)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. M/S. Perfect Prints, Through Its Sole ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Jul-02-2012

..... at the outset for appreciating the real controversy between the parties m s perfect prints sole proprietor concern of smt veena gupta had filed a consumer complaint no c 07 sc ..... appellant insurance company ex major pradeep gupta husband and authorized representative of smt veena gupta sole proprietor of the complainant respondent and have considered their submissions having done so we are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 2012 (HC)

Dinesh Bastimal JaIn (Sole Vs. Nirmal Singh and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-09-2012

..... delhi date of decision 9th january 2012 cont cas crl 3 2011 dinesh bastimal jain sole proprietorship firm petitioner through mr n k kantawala and mr praver sharma advocates versus nirmal ..... cs os no 672 2004 praying therein that the defendant m s pioneer products the sole proprietary firm of the petitioner be restrained from selling goods under the trademark vov or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

The Senior Manager (Contracts Cell), Chennai Petroleum Corporation Lim ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-22-2012

..... notwithstanding the amount of claim all the disputes or differences shall be settled by a sole arbitrator in accordance with scope forum of arbitration rules iii the venue of arbitration shall .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2012 (HC)

Micro Gate a Sole Proprietorship Concern Having Its Office. Vs. Arcain ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-28-2012

1 the instant petition is filed by the petitioner under section 433 e and f of the companies act seeking...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 2012 (TRI)

M/S Crescent Real Estates and Developers Rep. by Its Sole Proprietor V ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Oct-09-2012

oral order r lakshminarsimha rao member 1 the first opposite party is the appellant the first respondent filed complaint seeking...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 2012 (TRI)

Bank of Baroda, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Banking Compani ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Nov-08-2012

justice j m malik presiding member 1 this order shall decide the revision petition filed in respect of an interim...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //