So Called - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: so called Page 1 of about 35 results (0.031 seconds)Call Vs. Palmer
Court: US Supreme Court
misrepresentation of Burnham did not injuriously affect any right of Call unless it can Page 116 U. S. 103 be said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLong Sault Development Co. Vs. Call
Court: US Supreme Court
of New York by the Long Sault Development Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGauhati Public Call Office Association Vs. District Manager, Telephone ...
Court: Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati
it can be allowed in case the owners of Public Call Offices give an undertaking in the prescribed pro-forma vide paragraph
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBest Call Taxi Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2007)7STR218
1. During the period April, 2002 - September, 2003 the appellants had rendered "Call Taxi" services but did not pay...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“case Called Several Times Since Morning. Vs. Jagroop Kaur --respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
itself, the trial Court had passed the following order:- Case called several times since morning. Neither petitioner Harpinder Singh nor any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBest Call Taxi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2006)STR28
1. The lower authorities have imposed penalties of Rs. 22,615/-and Rs. 1,000/- under Sections 76 and 77 respectively of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShriram Investment Services Limited, Unit of Shriram Group of Companie ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2006]133CompCas830(Mad); (2006)4MLJ743
Revision Petition is preferred by Shriram Investment Services Limited (hereinafter called 'SISL') the respondent before the Arbitral Tribunal and Palki/Jeypad Investment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Mittal & Anr vs.darzi on Call
Court: Delhi
where finding that there was nothing else in the so called device than the words Cafe Madras, the said words were
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWestern Union Tel. Co. Vs. Call Publishing Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
according to the various kinds of service it may be called upon to render, considering its duty to the public and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Maruthavanaswami Alias Sadasiva Desika Pandarasannadhi Avergal Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1925Mad240; 85Ind.Cas.414; (1924)47MLJ770
1. These revision petitions have been filed in respect of two orders of the Subordinate Judge of Mayavaram, dated 29th...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>