Shell Less - Judgment Search Results

Shell Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

Shell v. Mississippi - 498 U.S. 1 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Shell v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 1 (1990) Shell

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company of India Ltd. Vs. th ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC922; [1971(22)FLR11]; (1970)IILLJ590SC; (1970)3SCC378; [1971]2SCR758

allowance, overtime payment, duty allowance, other allowances, and bonus for the year 1965-66, between the employers, Messrs Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd., Bombay (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') and a set … Srinivasan was called upon to attend to patients, it could not be stated that he did any the less supervisory work. It may be that if the duties are measured by time, he spent more time in

Shell Transource Limited Vs. Shell International Petroleum Company Ltd ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

non-user. This is the question in this case. 2. This application has been filed for removing the mark SHELL AUTOSERV under Registration No. 1237451 in class 36. 3. The ground on which the applicant seeks rectification is

Mac's Shell Service, Inc. Vs. Shell Oil Products Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. - 08-240 (2010) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2009 MAC'S SHELL SERVICE, INC. … to make success impossible.” 524 F. 3d, at 46. But surely these same factors compel employees and tenants-no less than service-station franchisees-to try to make their changed arrangements work. Nonetheless, courts have long required plaintiffs asserting such

Burmah Shell Oil Distributing Now Known as Bharat Petroleum Corporatio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC1470; JT1988(2)SC429; 1988(1)SCALE1074; (1988)3SCC44; [1988]3SCR811; 1988(2)LC148(SC)

called the respondent) with permission to sub-lease the same. The said Latifur Rehman sub-leased the premises to Burmah Shell Oil Distributing Company (the petitioner herein) for running a petrol pump and making necessary constructions thereon. The lease … 1987 of the High Court of Patna. On 16th January, 1958 a lease deed was executed between the lessee Latifur Rehman and lessor Khaja Midhat Noor (hereinafter called the respondent) with permission to sub-lease the same. The

Shell Company of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1126

1. The question involved in this appeal is whether the appellant-company was entitled to deduct the loss of 1,59,896 in V.S.A. in the accounting year 1957 corresponding to the assessment year 1958-59. The Income-tax Officer held...

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd. (Now K ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1995]211ITR218(SC); JT1994(3)SC162; 1994(2)SCALE481; 1994Supp(2)SCC239; [1994]3SCR374

the said High Court dated June 8, 1977 in Income Tax Reference No. 336 of 1970.2. The Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company of India Ltd. (now known as Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.) hereinafter referred to

Burmah Shell Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chief Commi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995Supp(1)SCC533

Matched in: Parties Burmah Shell Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Technical) New Delhi and ors.

The Burmah-shell Refineries Limited Vs. their Workmen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC917; [1961(2)FLR273]; (1961)ILLJ644SC; [1961]3SCR669

Thus for the year 1951, we find that in disputes between the three oil companies - The Burmah Shell, the Caltex and the Standard Vacuum, and their employees in their Calcutta office the Labour Appellate Tribunal discussed … general practice in awards in the matter of bonus had in the past been to award or grant lesser amounts to clerical employees than to labour, and that in any case, to grant the same rate of

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India, Ltd. and anr. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC315; [1961]1SCR902; [1960]11STC764(SC)

two appeal on a certificate under Art. 132(1) of the Constitution have been filed respectively by the Burmah Shell Oil storage and Distributing Co. of India, Ltd., and the Standard Vacuum Oil Company (in this judgment referred … this Court observed that the point could no longer be said to be at large. Fortunately, there is less disagreement on this point than on the interpretation of the Explanation, and it is sufficient to refer to