Sharp Set - Judgment Search Results

Fcc Vs. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court of appeals c 788 46 stat 844 in sharp contrast with the previous grant of authority the court was ..... grant its original application instead of doing so the commission set for argument respondent s application along with two rival applications ..... give respondent a noncomparative consideration because its application had been set down for hearing before the later and rival applications were .....

Hoti Lal Vs. Chatura Prasad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1941All110

..... word passed in section 73 of the present code there is sharp conflict of judicial opinion about the interpretation of the words the ..... has decided should be reversed i would therefore allow the appeal set aside the decree of the lower appellate court and remand the case ..... appeal is allowed the decree of the lower appellate court is set aside and the case is remanded to that court for decision of .....

Emperor Vs. Jit Lal Bahadur

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1940Cal378

..... death was due to these injuries and that it may have been caused by a sharp cutting weapon like a kukri 2 on the police being informed the case was investigated ..... accept the verdict of the jury and acquit the accused we direct that he be set at liberty forthwith the reference is rejected henderson j 5 i agree after going through .....

N. Subramania Sastrulu of Kandukur and anr. Vs. the Official Receiver ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad274; (1940)2MLJ846

..... the authorities in england are very clear in this matter see sharp official receiver v jackson 1899 a c 419 and ex parte taylor ..... official receiver s applications the learned district judge of chittoor has set aside the learned subordinate judge s order and annulled all ..... been actually to prefer a creditor before his alienation could be set aside has also been adopted in india see buchayyagari ranga .....

Rai Kiran Chandra Roy Bahadur and ors. Vs. Brajes Charan Sen and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1940Cal306

learned advocate for the respondents is that it had been settled conclusively between the predecessors of the parties in 1858 that

Union Joint Stock Bank of Detroit Vs. Byerly

Court: US Supreme Court

its earlier order of dismissal which would be disturbed by setting aside the order the petition was dismissed the debtor appealed

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1940Mad620; (1940)1MLJ690

its costs in all three courts advocate s fee one set in this court section 16 1 c tarun chatterjee aftab

Gadadhar Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Sarat Chandra Chakravarty and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1941Cal193

suit were at the time of the decennial and permanent settlement of 1790 and 1793 respectively in the bed of the

United States Vs. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

not been for the improvident withdrawals would have gone to settlers and preemptors the claim is that the court below should

Minersville Sch. Dist. Vs. Board of Educ.

Court: US Supreme Court

to survive and powers conferred upon it are not necessarily set at naught by the express prohibitions of the bill of