Sharp Set - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sharp set Year: 1913 Page 1 of about 80 results (0.146 seconds)Zainab Bee Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-1913
Reported in: 24Ind.Cas.513
..... and he relied on the decision of the house of lords in sharp v no doubt these are interesting questions of law but they only ..... we do not think so or direct further inquiry for the reasons set out above it seems to me that the appellant has failed to ..... examination as witness warrant of arrest whether proper proceedings need not be set aside transfer by husband to wife 7 000 purported to be the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: an Attorney
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-29-1913
Reported in: (1914)ILR41Cal446
..... competent to the discharge of his office ought to confine himself per lord halsbury in sharp v wakefield 1891 a c 173 35 in the course of argument the case of ..... testimony and as it was impossible to foresee a conviction with anything approaching certainty they set aside the sanction 30 it is difficult to grade these decisions usefully when they range .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinnesota Rate Case
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-09-1913
..... south dakota grain fields along its entire line it comes in sharp competition with strong intersecting railroad lines and while as before ..... a unified control over interstate and intrastate rates it has not set up a standard for intrastate rates or prescribed or authorized ..... the decision below not upon the ground that it incorrectly sets forth conditions in minnesota and adjoining states but for what .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSorabji Hormusji Batlivala Vs. Jamshedji Merwanji Wadia
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-26-1913
Reported in: AIR1914Bom218; (1913)15BOMLR959
..... driving motor car at excessive speed railway crossing failure to negotiate the sharp curve of the road beyond the crossing and concealed from the ..... s car for one reason or another failed to take the sharp right handed turn after the crossing instead of doing so it ..... closed against him or that his speed was within the limits set by ordinary prudence it may be added that this almost contemporaneous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVaithinatha Pillai Vs. the King-emperor
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-24-1913
Reported in: (1913)15BOMLR910
..... of them very severe and many such as could only have been inflicted with some sharp instrument used with very great force for instance wound no 2 was an incised wound ..... allowed to stand and they have humbly advised his majesty accordingly practice criminal proceedings conviction set aside grave and substantial injustice evidence want of reliable evidence reception of inadmissible evidence effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.N. Lang Vs. Heptullabhai Ismailjee
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-1913
Reported in: AIR1914Bom271; (1913)15BOMLR939
no difference in my decision the case is that of sharp v machenryi 1 the court there was not considering whether
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOld Colony Trust Co. Vs. Omaha
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-16-1913
..... squares within the city laws 1883 p 89 c 10 15 subdivs 8 24 in sharp v south omaha 53 neb 700 705 the supreme court of the state had occasion ..... bonds issued by it in 1903 and 1904 the claim of the trust company as set forth in the bill is that the resolution of 1908 is a law of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Chandler-dunbar Water Power Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-26-1913
state of the title and pending litigation affecting it is set up in the pleadings the fact that the government seeks
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStarr Vs. Long Jim
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1913
adult person shall be furnished with one wagon one double set of harness one grain cradle one plow one harrow one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMichigan Central R. Co. Vs. Vreeland
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-20-1913
on the substance of the cause of action schreiber v sharpless 110 u s 76 110 u s 80 martin v ohio r co 151 u s 673 nothing is better settled than that at common law the right of action for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial