Shareholders - Year 2016 - Judgments

May 19 2016 (HC)

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Ors. Vs. Ajay Kumar Newar and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-19-2016

..... he submitted that if the assets of a company cannot be the asset of the shareholder the shareholder cannot make any provision relating to the assets of the company in her will ..... was held that control of a company vests in the voting powers of its shareholders and the shareholders holding a controlling interest can determine the nature of the business its management enter .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 2016 (SC)

Pramod Jain and Ors Vs. Sebi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-07-2016

..... institutions against its property including 18 7 per cent shares out of the promoters shareholdings disputes were pending before the arbitrator arising out of default in payments most valuable ..... taken by the target company to frustrate an offer without the approval of the shareholders 3 the committee made various recommendations including requirement of disclosure by the acquirers procedure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 2016 (HC)

M/s. K.V.T. Builders Private Limited and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-15-2016

..... 256 of 2016 dispensed with the convening and holding of the meeting of the equity shareholders of the above transferor companies and the transferee company respectively to consider the proposed scheme ..... inter alia for the reason that its equity shareholders had given their consent to it 7 upon notice being issued the regional director ministry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 2016 (HC)

Principle Commissioner Vs. Sri. Rajeev

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-23-2016

..... individuals being r and d are the common persons holding more than requisite amount of shareholding and are having requisite interest in the firm but then thereby the deemed dividend would ..... because if so distributed the dividend income would became taxable in the hands of the shareholders instead of distributing accumulated profits as dividend companies distribute them as loan or advances to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 2016 (HC)

Dr. Jayanta Kumar and Ors. Vs. Astha Nursing Home Private Limited and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-14-2016

..... held in dale carrington investment pvt ltd supra that the act to convert a majority shareholder into a minority shareholder has been considered to be an act of oppression and mismanagement both within the ..... that the agreement is sacrosanct and an agreement entered into between the two groups of shareholders who are essentially the partners in the company must be honoured the directors are required .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2016 (SC)

State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-20-2016

..... concessions permit and lease are the property of the company and not of its shareholders the shareholders may keep on changing and the control and management in the company may also ..... inter se relationship between holding and subsidiary companies and fundamental principles regarding distinction between a shareholder and the company it is apparent that merely on account of the company becoming .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2016 (HC)

Sajal Dutta Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-16-2016

..... learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that sometimes the shareholders are granted fundamental rights if those rights are impaired by ..... qualitative if the state action impairs the rights of the shareholders as well as of the company the court will not ..... company is a juristic entity it is different from its shareholders an action of the government or its instrumentality should cause .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 2016 (HC)

Smt. Persis a. Khambatta and Anr. Vs. Industrial Investment Bank of In ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-21-2016

..... demonstrate that the terms of the relevant issue prohibited the alteration of the rights of shareholders who had subscribed to the preference issue however the defendant could have altered the rights ..... has not taken appropriate steps to alter the rights of the relevant class of preference shareholders to which the plaintiffs belong as a consequence the subsisting interim order stands confirmed and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2016 (HC)

Aysha and Another Zareena Mohammed and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-22-2016

..... reason of nature of the property secondly by the number of shareholders and thirdly due to any other special circumstances a division of ..... court is translated into physical delivery of respective properties to the shareholders in a just and appropriate manner in the case on hand ..... to which the suit relates or of the number of the shareholders therein or of any other special circumstance a division of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 2016 (HC)

M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director K. Vija ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-14-2016

..... companies for denial of security clearance who is neither a director nor a majority shareholder controlling the companies the contention of the respondents that though the said individual is neither ..... a director nor a majority shareholder the lifting of corporate veil will reveal that the alleged individual is the controlling person .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Shareholders - Judgment Search Results