Shareholders - Year 1995 - Judgments

Apr 17 1995 (HC)

Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders' Association Vs. Sakt ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1995

Reported in: [1998]93CompCas646(Mad); (1995)IIMLJ469

..... this court for necessary directions for convening and conducting an extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders to consider the proposed scheme of amalgamation the respondent filed c a no 264 ..... company to get adequate financial help pursuant thereto notices were sent to all the equity shareholders along with copies of the proposed scheme of amalgamation besides statements under section 393 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1995 (HC)

Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders' Association, represe ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1995

Reported in: (1995)2MLJ469

..... court for necessary directions for convening and conducting an extra ordinary general meeting of the shareholders to consider the proposed scheme of amalgamation the respondent filed c a no 264 of ..... coimbatore as chairman of the meeting pursuant thereto notices were sent to all the equity shareholders along with copies of the proposed scheme of amalgamation besides statements under section 393 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1995 (SC)

Deputy Collector, Northern Sub-division, Panaji Vs. Comunidade of Bamb ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-26-1995

Reported in: AIR1996SC148; 1995(3)ALT31(SC); 1995(4)SCALE721; (1995)5SCC333; [1995]Supp2SCR359; 1995(2)LC586(SC)

..... contained in memoranda submitted by four ex directors of the company who continued to be shareholders and by ordering an investigation under s 237 b the respondent board had in effect ..... enabled these shareholders to circumvent the provisions of s 235 and s 236 on this ground also the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 1995 (HC)

Geiminy Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-03-1995

Reported in: [1999]114STC259(Kar)

..... of the act is made as soon as the request for sale is made by shareholder under section 2 any other co sharer becomes entitled to make an application under section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 1995 (SC)

Panchanan Sharma Vs. Basudeo Prasad Jaganani and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-22-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC1743; 1995(2)ALT52(SC); I(1995)BC470(SC); JT1997(10)SC553; RLW1998(1)SC148; 1995(2)SCALE641; 1995Supp(2)SCC574; 1995(2)LC143(SC)

..... to respondent respondent seeking enforcement of award in foreign court held it is violative of shareholders agreement appellant can challenge the award in indian courts further in view of injunction restraining .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 1995 (TRI)

Tracstar Investments Limited and Vs. Gordon Woodroffe Limited and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Nov-08-1995

Reported in: (1996)87CompCas941

..... sspl deviating from their fiduciary position decided to act against the interests of the majority shareholders of sspl with the active co operation of gwl without such active co operation and ..... but for a collateral purpose by a board not elected by the support of majority shareholders and facilitated by gwl by issue of duplicate certificates against the provisions of law 114 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 1995 (HC)

In Re: Maknam Investments Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-13-1995

Reported in: [1996]87CompCas689(Cal)

..... were complied with the majority was acting bona fide the class of creditors and shareholders were fairly represented and that the scheme was sanctioned by an overwhelming majority they had ..... could be transferred to the foreign company then the amalgamation cannot be withheld when the shareholders themselves did not raise any objection nor was it raised by financial institutions or statutory .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1995 (TRI)

Chandrika Prasad Sinha Vs. Bata India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Sep-29-1995

Reported in: (1997)88CompCas81

..... the provisions of law an exclusive benefit was granted only to the foreign shareholding company in a shareholders democracy through the mechanism prescribed by law if the proposal has been approved ..... stated that the petitioner has not disclosed the vast majority of correspondence between the petitioner shareholder and the company for instance the petitioner s letter dated july 13 1992 containing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 1995 (TRI)

Kusumben Kantilal Shah Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Jul-28-1995

Reported in: (1996)56ITD476(Ahd.)

..... to the assessee did not involve a transfer he noted that the two groups of shareholders though related somehow belonged to altogether different families and there was nothing common amongst ..... the shares were transferred had no antecedent title in these shares the two groups of shareholders though related somehow belonged to altogether different families and there was nothing common amongst .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 1995 (HC)

Michael Heath Nathan Johnson Vs. Subhash Chandra and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-01-1995

Reported in: 60(1995)DLT757

..... outwood investments limited 2 wittering holdings inc 3 jassen international that the ultimate 100 shareholders owner and sole principal of rubies overseas ltd is the first defendant there are ..... venture through their respective companies an agreement between rubies and esher for controlling the shareholdings of the joint venture roadgold and three agreements with the joint venture roadgold and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Shareholders - Judgment Search Results