Setting Up - Judgment Search Results

Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)10SCC216

The Text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedThe appellant challenged the permission given to the respondent enabling him to appear in section c and D Examination conducted by Calcutta University. The Supreme...

Set Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd., a Company Incorporated and Registe ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR2726; 2008BusLR850(Bom); (2008)218CTR(Bom)452; [2008]307ITR205(Bom)

enterprise. It is further submitted that the judgment in Morgan Stanley (supra) would not have the effect of setting aside the order of ITAT.9. For answering the issue we may firstly refer to some of the provisions

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590

the Act, (b) empowering the TRAI to fix terms and conditions of inter-connectivity between service providers, (c) tariff setting function of TRAI has been brought under the purview of Sub-section (3) of Section 11. By means of

“we Thus Set-aside the Direction of the Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.78 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:17. 01.2013 Varinder Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF...

“....Action Plans Set by This Court on Its Administrative Side Vs. A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CR No.1556 of 2014 (O&M) :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1556 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Bharat Rajput ....Petitioner Versus Amrik Singh Aulakh & Others ....Respondents CORAM:-...

Set India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Patna

Rajendra Prasad, J.1. This criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding including the order dated 6.9.2002 passed in complaint case No. 855 (C)...

Set Discovery Private Limited Vs. Banjara Tele Links Private Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(5)ALD644

Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the order passed on 24.6.2003 by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad on an application (I.A. No. 1735 of 2003) filed in O.P. No. 1303 of 2003...

Dominent Off-set (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-c ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)ILLJ64P& H; (1997)116PLR736

S.C. Malte, J.1. All these three writ petitions are being disposed of by the common judgment because of the factual and legal questions involved in these petitions are the same. All these petitions are against the...

Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)

Matched in: Parties Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit

Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT538(Cal)

Deb, J.1. This Rule Nisi under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed inter alia, against the re-seizure of the same goods which were seized earlier under section 110(1) of Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to...