Set Up - Judgment Search Results
Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-29-1999
Reported in: (2000)10SCC216
Matched in: Parties Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ors.
Set Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd., a Company Incorporated and Registe ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR2726; 2008BusLR850(Bom); (2008)218CTR(Bom)452; [2008]307ITR205(Bom)
entered into for providing certain support services to MSCo.MSCo outsourced some of its activities to MSAS. MSAS was set up to support the main office functions in equity and fixed income research, account reconciliation and providing IT enabled
Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590
notice dated 25th January, 2005.9. Mr. Aditya Narayan, Advocate submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside, because it is tantamount to directing that the petitioner does business with a defaulting party, contrary to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“we Thus Set-aside the Direction of the Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
asking of the Court, Mr.Kulvir Narwal,Addl. Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. A complete set of paper book has been supplied to him. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, we
“....Action Plans Set by This Court on Its Administrative Side Vs. A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
(O&M) :2: Suri versus Trust Bagichi Nathan and others decided on 7.2.2014, I observed as follows:- “....Action Plans set by this Court on its administrative side are aimed at dispensing justice tempered with speedy disposal. Such Action
Set India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 in this application are accused Nos. 6 and 7 in the complaint petition.3. SET India Private Limited through N.P. Singh, Chief Financial Officer, 23, Shah Industrial Estate Off Veera Desai Road, Andheri
Set Discovery Private Limited Vs. Banjara Tele Links Private Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD644
of 2003 granting interim mandatory injunction against the appellant herein directing it to restore signal services consisting of SET, SETMAX, AXN, CNBC, DISCOVERY and ANIMAL PLANET etc, to the respondent's network forthwith and directing the respondent to
Dominent Off-set (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-c ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-1997
Reported in: (1998)ILLJ64P& H; (1997)116PLR736
of the fact as a justification for taking a particular action against the workman. It is in the set of this legal position, now it is to be seen as to what was the case of the
Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)
above numbered appeal. The Tribunal accepted the submission of the revenue and allowing the appeals of the revenue, set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restored the order of the assessing officer.3. At the hearing
Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-1979
Reported in: 1979(4)ELT538(Cal)
Matched in: Parties Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free