Sectionize - Judgment Search Results
Gabelli Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Gabelli v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes...
Sec Vs. Zandford
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-03-2002
22, 1994); Zandford v. NASD, Civ. Action No. 93-1274,1993 WL 580761 (D. D. C., Nov. 5,1993)). 819 II Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act makes it "unlawful for any person ... [t]o use or employ, in
Sec Vs. Edwards
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-2004
rate of return can be an “investment contract” and thus a “security” subject to the federal securities laws. Section 2(a)(1) of the 1933 Act and §3(a)(10) of the 1934 Act define “security” to include an “investment contract,”
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Aaron Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1980
2, 1980 446 U.S. 680 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act) makes it unlawful for any person in the offer
Steadman Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-25-1981
the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws had been violated. Pp. 450 U. S. 97 -104. (a) Section 7(c)'s language implies the enactment of a standard of proof. By allowing sanctions to be imposed only when
Dirks Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1983
of guilty or a conviction after trial. See Brief for Petitioner 15; App. 149-153. [ Footnote 5 ] Section 17(a), as set forth in 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), provides: "It shall be unlawful for any person in
SEC Vs. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1984
SEC v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc. - 467 U.S. 735 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc., 467 U.S. 735 (1984) Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc. No. 83-751 Argued...
Lowe Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1985
order revoking the registration of Lowe Management Corporation and barring Lowe from future association with an investment adviser. Section 203(e) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-3(e), authorizes the Commission to revoke the registration of any investment
Sec Vs. New England Elec. Sys.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-16-1966
. . ." 79 Cong.Rec. 14479. (Italics supplied.) As the Commission said in 1948: "The legislative history of Section 11(b)(1) indicates that it was the intent of Congress to create only a limited exception to the general
Sec Vs. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-1967
SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co. - 387 U.S. 202 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co., 387 U.S. 202 (1967) Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free