Sectionally - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sectionally Page 1 of about 628 results (0.017 seconds)Sec Vs. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Sess. (1939) Pt. I, p. 350. [ Footnote 6 ] Section 2(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 77b(1), provides: "The
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Chenery Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
SEC v. Chenery Corp. - 332 U.S. 194 (1947) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947)...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
issues or proposes to issue any security, with certain exceptions. Section 6(a) of the act provides: "Any security may be registered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Chenery Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
and equitable and as appropriate to effectuate the provisions of section 11, the court, as a court of equity may, to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co. - 387 U.S. 202 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. United Benefit Life...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Howey Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
owned and operated by the Howey Company in a scenic section adjacent to the groves. The hotel's advertising mentions the fine
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Drexel and Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
& Share Co., 20 S.E.C. 786. [ Footnote 2 ] Section 12(d) provides: "It shall be unlawful for any registered holding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSEC Vs. Louisiana Pub. Svc. Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
subsection shall be subject to judicial review as provided in section 79x of this title." It held that the Securities and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
to their variable annuity business. Page 359 U. S. 94 Section 3(a)(8) of the Securities Act, 48 Stat. 74, 76, 15
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. New England Elec. Sys.
Court: US Supreme Court
services for the whole NEES operation. [ Footnote 3 ] Section 11(b) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>