Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 9 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 9 Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 512 results (0.387 seconds)
Oct 13 2011 (HC)

Mrs. Geeta Ramesh Agrawal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-13-2011

for the year 1991 92 1996 97 1997 98 1998 99 and 1999 2000 the judicial officer was rated average her

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2011 (HC)

Purushottam Dev Arya Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-02-2011

..... to the petitioner the application is dismissed indian penal code ipc sections 120b nbsp punishment of criminal conspiracy nbsp learned counsel for the ..... 2009 2 jcc 1314 to contend that if the process under section 82 cr p c is mala fide then the petitioner can ..... prior to the initiation of the procurement process for the system 9 the petitioner has not cooperated in the investigation though charge sheet .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2011 (HC)

Oriental Bank of Commerce and anr. Vs. Pawan Kumar Aggarwal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-21-2011

..... annexure d amd the order of even number dated 22 9 2010 passed under section 6 c of the said act in the rectification application ..... the learned trial judge the protection available to defendant no 2 under section 10 of the negotiable instruments act 1881 was not available to ..... quash the revisional order passed by commissioner of commercial taxes under section 8 d of ket act 1958 dated 5 8 2010 vide .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 2011 (HC)

Shankara Rai Vs. Thimmanna Rai

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-17-2011

..... concluding that all the elements necessary for the application of sub section 6 of section 36 of the madras aliyasanthana act of 1949 are present ..... the opinion that all the conditions laid down in sub section 6 of section 36 have been complied with and that therefore ext b1 ..... court below that the document falls within the ambit of section 36 6 of act ix of 1949 cannot be sustained in the result this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2011 (TRI)

Powergrid Corporation of India Limited, Haryana Vs. Central Electricit ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Mar-23-2011

project 8221 nor an 8220 old asset 8221 requiring replacement 9 4 the central commission in the impugned order in petition

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2011 (HC)

Hindusthan Engineering and Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-20-2011

order nbsp 1 this is a section 9 application it is moved ex parte today on inter alia the apprehension that the respondent railways .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 2011 (HC)

L and T Finance Ltd Vs. Deepak Coal Depot and Deepak Stone

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-14-2011

..... out but no payment has been tendered by the respondents since the present petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 was filed 2 the receiver will continue to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2011 (TRI)

Old World Industries, Inc., Vs. Fleetguard Inc. and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-16-2011

..... mark fleet charge in class 1 under no 1324578 was rejected in view of section 9 2 11 1 a 11 1 b 11 2 a 11 2 b and 18 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Sakthi Hall Rep. by Its Partners Vs. V.M. Kandasamy and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Sep-23-2011

..... registered without sufficient cause the registration has been obtained in contravention of the provisions of sections 9 11 and 18 of the act 5 the 1st respondent has filed the counter statement ..... is aware of the same and therefore is estopped from objecting the 1st respondents use 9 in the year 2006 the 1st respondents wife filed a civil suit in o s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2011 (TRI)

Wyeth, (Formerly Known as American Home Products Corporation) Vs. Mahe ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-10-2011

..... on 06 09 2002 claiming user since 01 05 2002 the registration is prohibited under section 9 11 and 12 of the act the counsel then pointed out to the certificates issued ..... and considered the arguments of the counsel and have gone through the pleadings and documents 9 the appellants have opposed the registration of the trade mark anzocin on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //