Section 9 - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sarabhai Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2002]254ITR625(Guj)

court in cit v hence for the purpose of secttion 9 of the indian income tax act 1922 the owner must

K. Mohamed Elias and Co. and ors. Vs. the State of Madras and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1969]23STC27(Mad)

..... seek the decision of the supreme court is to the effect that by reason of section 9 3 of the central act the entire machinery provided in the state act including the ..... ordered the decision of the supreme court is to the effect that by reason of section 9 3 of the central act the entire machinery provided in the state act including the .....

Rammul Dayalmul Vs. Megh Raj Gunga Bux

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.199

..... the first point is that the petition itself does not sufficiently follow the wording of section 9 of the act and is not in accordance with the authorities mr strangman relied upon ..... suggested agreement has been come to insolvency debtors art 11 and 12 vic c 12 section 9 petition in insolvency form of wording of the act how far to be followed insolvent .....

Mangesh Balkrushnaji Deshmukh Vs. Vinayak Shikshan Sanstha and Others

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

..... tribunal amravati dismissing the appeal no 89 of 1999 filed by the petitioner under section 9 of the maharashtra employees of private schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 ..... petition is dismissed maharashtra employees of private schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 section 9 termination petitioner challenging his termination from service by an order tribunal had held that .....

In the Matter Of: Ex. Sepoy (Barber) Suraj Bhan Vs. Union of India and ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... i and fine of rs 500 by the court of chief judicial magistrate sangrur under section 9 1 of the opium act 1978 and this sentence was reduced by the sessions judge ..... the petition filed in the year 2000 the petition is therefore dismissed opium act 1978 section 9 1

Ms. Angammai Achi Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

..... imposing a penalty of rs 15 000 against the appellant for contravention of provisions of section 9 1 c of the foreign exchange regulation act 1973 for the reason that the appellant ..... 15 days from the date of receipt of this order foreign exchange regulation act 1973 section 9 comparative citation 2005 63 scl 197 atffe new delhi

Nanik Laungani Vs. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate

Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

..... a penalty of rs 1 0 lakh on the appellant for contravening the provisions of section 9 1 d of the foreign exchange regulation act 1973 2 shri rajan malkani assailed the ..... inspection of documents and provided copies thereof to the appellant foreign exchange regulation act 1973 section 9 comparative citation 2001 34 scl 462 atffe n delhi

Jogesh Chandra Lahiri Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 56Ind.Cas.657

..... limiting it to the ground that the facts found do not warrant a conviction under section 9 of the opium act the facts found are that the accused sold morphia as evidenced ..... rule is therefore discharged and the conviction and sentence affirmed opium act i of 1878 section 9 sale of morphia to patients by approved medical practitioner without license offence

In Re: P. Venkatachallam Chetti

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 25Ind.Cas.995

1 the petitioner has been convicted of an offence under section 9 of the opium act for possessing one seer of opium in contravention of the opium ..... also set aside the order of confiscation of the opium opium act i of 1878 section 9 mere contemplation of violating a rule whether punishable

Para Koothan and ors. Vs. Para Kulla Vandu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 31Ind.Cas.720

..... 117 it was held that a court had no power to give joint possession under section 9 of the specific relief act 3 in sabapathi chetti v subraya chetti 3 ma 250 ..... with costs dismissing the civil revision petition with costs specific relief act i of 1877 section 9 plaintiff in joint possession with defendant court whether can restore such possession