Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 561 results (0.534 seconds)M/S.Eastern India Containers Pvt. Ltd. Rep.Through Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-16-2012
..... to be quashed 11 the terminology cartel has been defined in section 2 c of the competition act 2002 which reads as ..... speak about the multiple alternate vendor development programme under certain contingencies 8 it would be profitable to quote the provisions of clause ..... of the prevailing market price to maintain transparency in the system 8 the opposite parties decided to float open tenders by giving .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S.Uma Laminated Products Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by Its C Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-16-2012
..... to be quashed 11 the terminology cartel has been defined in section 2 c of the competition act 2002 which reads as ..... speak about the multiple alternate vendor development programme under certain contingencies 8 it would be profitable to quote the provisions of clause ..... of the prevailing market price to maintain transparency in the system 8 the opposite parties decided to float open tenders by giving .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Sivaraman and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by Chairman and ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-03-2012
of the principal bench of the cat e annexure a 8 order dated 14 02 2008 in oa no 549 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTColonel A.D. Nargolkar Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
..... despite the complaint being withdrawn by the complainant judicial notice under section 134 of the army act was taken and that the ..... complainant was well aware of the workings of the system 8 thereafter on 3rd september 2007 the respondents forwarded the complaint ..... 2007 between colonel ad nargolkar ic 38032m resident of e 8 12 salunke vihar kondhawa pune 411048 maharashtra hereinafter called the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter Of: North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd., Megha ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Decided on: Sep-21-2012
10 5 2011 passed by the central electricity regulatory commission 8220 central commission 8221 in the matter of fixation of tariff
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.N. Chaturvedi Vs. State and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
..... henceforth 54 no order as to costs criminal procedure code section 397 negotiable instrument act 1881 section 138 probation of offenders act petitioner issued the ..... the petitioner was dismissed and he was taken into custody 8 it is how the petitioner has filed instant petition wherein ..... by string of deterrence interest in the sentencing system 8221 8 the court will be failing in its duty if appropriate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Jyoti Sharma Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Through Its ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
..... the revision petition of petitioner filed under section 17 8 of huda act in its order dated 8 12 2011 observed oelig the original file ..... for the settlement of consumer disputes and for matters connected therewith section 3 declares that the provisions contained in the act are ..... be allowed to sustain 8 hence this revision 9 it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that section 3 of the act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShajahan Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-31-2012
..... provisions of n d p s act and he was booked for the offence under sections 8 22 c and 29 of the said act 2 the petitioner would point out that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Haryana Service Station
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
..... challenging the termination of retail outlet in which the appellants herein moved an application under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 making a prayer that as per the agreement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPresent:- Mr. S.K. Rana Advocate Vs. Uco Bank and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
..... the loan agreement and failed to regularize his account the bank filed an application under section 8 1 of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions banks act 1973 hereinafter referred .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial