Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 511 results (0.538 seconds)
Jan 10 2000 (SC)

Wallace Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Montblanc Investment Pvt. Ltd. and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-10-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC3401; JT2000(2)SC24

..... by the present order 12 the civil appeal is disposed of accordingly 13 no costs section 8 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj possession of narcotic drug opium seized from possession ..... time and place thereof will be fixed by the learned arbitrator after hearing the parties 8 if any objection is raised regarding the evidence of any of the witnesses to be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2000 (SC)

Ali Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi Vs. Indo-french Biotech Enterprises Ltd. an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-21-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC2479; JT2000(4)SC228; (2000)9SCC373

..... today the appeal is disposed of accordingly there shall be no order as to costs sections 8 21 42 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj accused found in possession of huge ..... quantity of brown sugar however authorities failed to comply with requirements of section 42 2 documents required to prove receipt of oral information were not brought on record .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2000 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prithipal Singh and Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-20-2000

Reported in: [2001]249ITR670(SC)

..... is called for 2 the civil appeal is dismissed 3 no order as to costs sections 8 21 42 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj accused found in possession of huge ..... quantity of brown sugar however authorities failed to comply with requirements of section 42 2 documents required to prove receipt of oral information were not brought on record .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 2000 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Panama Chemicals Works

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-15-2000

Reported in: [2001]250ITR661(SC); (2003)9SCC181

..... 10ccb along with a return of income 4 the appeals are disposed of section 8 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj possession of narcotic drug opium seized from possession ..... the tribunal was justified in law in holding that the claim of the assessee under section 80i is justified even if he had not filed the audit report in form no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2000 (HC)

Krishnappa Vs. P. Venkatanarayana and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-15-2000

Reported in: I(2002)ACC257; 2002ACJ257; ILR2001KAR1004; 2001(6)KarLJ541

..... or insurer of the lorry or from the owner or driver of the matador van section 8 p d dinakaran c j v g sabhahit j handling hazardous substances without complying with ..... owner of the matador van which has no insurance on the date of the accident 8 at the very outset it has to be stated that in the decision referred in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2000 (SC)

Manorama Thampuratti Vs. C.K. Sujatha Thampuratti and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-10-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC3400; JT2000(2)SC285; 2001(4)SCALE367; (2000)9SCC233

..... after following the procedure laid down therein no costs section 8 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj possession of narcotic ..... not kept in view the limited jurisdiction conferred on it under section 100 of the cpc nor has it framed substantial questions ..... remanded the proceedings without strictly following the procedure laid down under section 100 of the cpc only on this short ground and without .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2000 (SC)

Union Bank of India Vs. Official Liquidator H.C. of Calcutta and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-26-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC3642; 2000(4)ALT39(SC); [2000]101CompCas317(SC); JT2000(7)SC86; 2000(4)SCALE551; (2000)5SCC274

..... the high court 31 the appeal stands disposed of accordingly no costs sections 8 21 41 2 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam ..... 411 along with interest after obtaining leave by the company judge under section 446 of the companies act by order dated 19th august 1991 ..... employees have already died against that order this appeal is filed 8 mr g l sanghi learned senior counsel for the appellant bank .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2000 (SC)

Khodey Brewing and Distilling Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-12-2000

Reported in: [2001]250ITR659(SC)

..... this appeal and set aside the judgment of the high court with the aforesaid direction section 8 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj possession of narcotic drug opium seized from possession ..... circumstances of the case the tribunal was right in law in holding that interest under section 139 8 215 of the act levied in the original assessment does not survive when a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2000 (HC)

Kumari Sneha Vs. National Insurance Company Limited, Krishnagiri, Tami ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-17-2000

Reported in: 2001ACJ862; ILR2000KAR2792; 2000(6)KarLJ40

..... from the date of receipt of this order with interest at 6 section 8 h n nagamohan das j general rules of succession in case of ..... without leaving any relations specified in class of schedule to section 8 of the hindu succession act petitioners come under class ii of schedule ..... to section 8 of the act and want to come on record as surviving .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 2000 (SC)

Om Prakash Chugh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-01-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD(Cri)113; 2001(49)BLJR822; 2000CriLJ3486; JT2000(3)SC402; (2000)10SCC612

..... accordingly dismissed as withdrawn 9 appeals are accordingly disposed of sections 8 21 42 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj accused ..... the plea that a magistrate while forwarding a complaint under section 156 3 of the code can direct the investigation to ..... brown sugar however authorities failed to comply with requirements of section 42 2 documents required to prove receipt of oral information .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //