Section 77 - Judgment Search Results

Savarimuthu Pillai Vs. Alagiam Pillai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1902)12MLJ88

..... court fee payable on a memorandum of appeal also plaint in a matter arising under section 77 of the registration act 111 of 1877 to enforce registration is a fixed fee of .....

Nutting Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

..... lives or interests in this commonwealth shall be deemed to be made therein and in sections 77 82 it prescribes the conditions with which foreign insurance companies must comply before they can ..... manner in the negotiation or transaction of unlawful insurance evidently intending insurance declared unlawful by section 3 with a foreign insurance company not admitted to do business in this commonwealth .....

imam Bandi Bibi Vs. Udit Upadhia and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1902)ILR24All402

..... registrar therefore summarily rejected it the present suit was then instituted underline permission given by section 77 of the act the plaintiff respondent prays for a declaration of her right to have ..... refusal to register satisfied all the conditions precedent to the bringing of a suit under section 77 or was a fulfilment of all the necessary preliminaries the sub registrar therefore adopted the .....

Jadu Nandan Goswami Vs. Ashutosh Goswami

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1902)ILR29Cal688

..... to be wound up voluntarily now special resolution is defined by section 77 of the companies act it must be passed by a ..... retained or become accountable for indian companies act vi of 1882 sections 77 136 173 214 directors of a company misappropriation toy power of ..... court to make an order under section 214 of the companies act rendering all the directors jointly .....

Burt Vs. Union Central Life Ins. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

miscarriage of justice in evans v jones 5 mees w 77 an action was brought on a wager as to the

National Foundry Vs. Oconto Water Supply Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

reported in 346 u s app 619 and 77 f 774 a petition for a rehearing was denied among other things

Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Reiss

Court: US Supreme Court

s 621 1902 texas pacific railway company v reiss no 77 argued november 27 december 2 1901 decided january 13 1902

Northern Assur. Co. Vs. Grand View Building Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... instrument this rule is thus expressed in greenleaf on evidence vol 1 sec 275 12th ed when parties have deliberately put their engagements into ..... march 26 1900 affirmed the judgment of the circuit court 101 f 77 thereafter on petition of the defendant company a writ of certiorari ..... company or its agents at the inception of the contract 101 f 77 page 183 u s 341 in such divergence of decisions we .....

Gopal Chunder Bose Vs. Kartick Chunder Dey

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1902)ILR29Cal716

v velu pandaram 1899 l r 27 i a 69 77 i l r 23 mad 271 280 281 were referred

illinois Vs. Illinois Central R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by virtue of its riparian proprietorship of lots formerly constituting part of section 10 extend into the lake beyond the point of practical navigability ..... 16 1901 decided february 3 1902 184 u s 77 appeal from the circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit ..... court illinois v illinois central r co 184 u s 77 1902 illinois v illinois central railroad company no 28 argued march .....