Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 77 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 77 Page 1 of about 1,727,642 results (0.728 seconds)
Feb 26 1968 (HC)

Union of India Owning and Administering Central Railway Per General Ma ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1969Bom401; (1969)71BOMLR214; ILR1969Bom864; 1968MhLJ797

..... of claim upon manager of railways which haw handled goods whether notice sufficient compliance with section 77 under section 77 of the indian railways act 1890 the service of notice of claim upon the ..... for damages that plaintiff has not admittedly given any notice under section 77 the notice under section 77 is an imperative notice that section lays down that unless such a notice as is contemplated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 1991 (HC)

Mr. S. Bangarappa Vs. Somappa

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1991KAR970

..... enable them to claim the benefit of section 77 of the act except mentioning section 77 as though it could be invoked as ..... their claim under section 77 all this on the postulate that section 77 applies if at all the application of section 77 and itself is ..... amp doctrine of double possibility private interest seeking benefit under section 77 not public cause litigation claim that if applications not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1963 (HC)

Nannah Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1964Raj40

..... has not said so clearly as he should have that a combined notice under section 80 civil procedure code and section 77 of the railways act if so given would be perfectly valid and he ..... accepted above and which is to the effect that 1 a combined notice under section 80 civil procedure code and section 77 of the railways act can validly be given such a combined notice is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1991 (HC)

T.M. Chandrasekhar Vs. L.R. Shivaramegowda

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1992KAR444; 1991(3)KarLJ308

..... absolutely no reason to exclude non comliance with sub sections 1 2 of section 77 simply because sub section 3 also falls under the same section 77 sub section 3 no doubt covers expenditure of more than ..... no reason to exclude non comliance with sub sections 1 2 of section 77 simply because sub section 3 also falls under the same section 77 sub section 3 no doubt covers expenditure of more than .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1962 (SC)

Jetmull Bhojraj Vs. the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1962SC1879; (1963)IMLJ89(SC); [1963]2SCR832

..... my opinion ex p 3 cannot be regarded as a notice satisfying the requirement of section 77 it makes no claim for compensation at all and is merely a letter stating that ..... compensation on the damages caused to the goods for which the notice as required under section 77 of the indian railways act 1890 was also issued was barred by limitation it also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1980 (HC)

Loyd Bituman Products (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Represented ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)2MLJ363

..... this court by way of revision suryamurthy j dismissed the revision holding as follows this section section 77 has been introduced into the railways act by the legislature in its wisdom evidently with ..... 255 air1974all255 in the course of his judgment the learned judge has observed sub section 2 of section 77 of the railways act specifies that the railway administration shall not be responsible for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 1971 (HC)

Union of India, Owning Eastern Railway by Its General Manager, Calcutt ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1972Mad134; (1971)2MLJ257

..... escape from their liability to pay compensation under the provisions of section 77 b of the railways act section 77 b runs as follows 77 b further provision with respect to the responsibility of a ..... failure to deliver goods etc to put forward defence on basis of section 77 b loss of goods must be proved section 77 b does not afford any protection against non delivery in view of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 09 1984 (HC)

Union of India, Eastern Railway and anr. Vs. St. Joseph Textiles, Karu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1985Mad360; (1985)1MLJ274

..... leave to appeal to supreme court hence leave refused 26 appeal allowed commercial bailment sections 77 1 77 2 and 77 4 of railways act 1890 and railways amendment act 1972 appeal against decree ..... recovery of damages railway not duty bound to explain how goods delivered statutory protection under section 77 2 available held judgment and decree passed by lower court set aside the plaintiff also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1959 (HC)

P.R. Narayanaswami Iyer and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1960Mad58

..... to be ineffectual and not in accordance with sec 77 the purpose of a notice under sec 77 is not anything more than giving information of ..... concerned were owned by the government a separate action notice under sec 77 of the indian railways act should be given to each ..... railways put forward the extreme contention that the intimation required by sec 77 of the railways act should be given to every railway .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1980 (HC)

The Municipal Corporation of the City of Rajkot Vs. Sonik Industries, ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1981Guj1; (1980)GLR838(GJ)

..... statute as such but we are concerned with the approach to the construction of a section like section 77 9 mr a h mehta for the appellant municipal corporation has very strongly relied ..... statute as such but we are concerned with the approach to the construction of a section like section 77 9 mr to miss the ideological thrust of our constitution and the economic orientation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //