Section 77 Of The 1951 Act By The Amendment Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 77 of the 1951 act by the amendment act Sorted by: old Court: customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal cestat delhi Page 1 of about 301 results (1.113 seconds)Tulsidas Khimji Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC384DTri(Delhi)
the central government which stands transferred to this tribunal under section 131 b of the customs act 1962 for disposal as to this tribunal under section 131 b of the customs act 1962 for disposal as if it were an appeal presented
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Meier Heinz Albert Vs. Additional Collector (Air
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)(12)ELT636TriDel
also separately prosecuted for the commission of offence punishable under sections 132 and 133 1 a of the customs act 1962 to have been the subject matter of the earlier nefarious activities of mr kurt in collusion with mr saleem ahmed it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC439DTri(Delhi)
assessment made by the assistant collector of customs under sub section 2 of section 28 of the act consequent to less import department of the bombay custom house on 17 10 77 when the goods were assessed under heading no 84 59 proceedings from an order under section 27 of the customs act was upheld by the supreme court in an appeal taken 1962 hereinafter called the act as it existed before its amendment by the finance act 1980 no 2 of 1980 which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Alkali and Chemical Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC2034DTri(Delhi)
rule 9a of the central excise rules 1944 in fact section 3 of the act on which shri sengupta has heavily central excise rules 1944 in fact section 3 of the act on which shri sengupta has heavily relied in support of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.C.P. Limited Vs. Collector of Customs and Central
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC397DTri(Delhi)
august 1980 which has been transferred to the tribunal under section 35 p of the central excises amp salt act 1944 duty under notification no 317 77 ce dated 16 11 77 the said 300 quintals of sugar was transported under gate under section 35 p of the central excises amp salt act 1944 and is accordingly being disposed of as appeal 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.V. Dabke and Sons Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC235DTri(Delhi)
1 under section 131 of the customs act 1962 hereinafter referred to as importer or exporter so that in any proceedings under this act the owner importer or exporter of the goods shall also this notification it may be seen that this is an amendment to the previous notification no 95 dated 12 5 78
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaj Enterprises Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC524DTri(Delhi)
was transferred to the tribunal by virtue of provisions of section 131 b 2 of the customs act 1962 as if customs tariff we accordingly allow the appeal and direct consequential action to be taken up by the departmental authorities 13 apart
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanwar Sewing Machine Co. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC264DTri(Delhi)
heading 2 of heading 84 41 note 2 b to section xvi requires that a part if suitable for use solely of india which under section 131 b of the customs act 1982 is to be proceeded with as if it were
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJeth Mal and Lal Das Vs. Collector of Customs and Central
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC344DTri(Delhi)
they were seized since such goods are not covered by section 123 in this case the party took upon himself the shown to the appellant 13 chapter iva of the customs act is designed to detect illegally imported goods and prevent their
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOswal Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)LC347DTri(Delhi)
s adya industries the goods do not also fall under section 123 so it has been wrongly held that the appellants imported old and used woollen serviceable garments in follow up action 5 bales and 16 boras containing such garments were also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT