Section 77 Of The 1951 Act By The Amendment Act - Judgment Search Results

India Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1991)(33)ECC188

..... dated 25 2 1976 as amended by notification no 683 e dated 19 10 1986 in the light of section 30 of industries development and regulation act 1951 65 of 1951 and rule 3 of ..... of the authorities are also enumerated as above 11 the appellants in e appeal no 77 84 erb m s auckland international ltd have contended that they are manufacturing jute yarn .....

Cce, Allahabad Vesus M/S Hindalco Industries Ltd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

service receivers were not required to file any return under section 70 and they were not required to disclose any information date of default to date of payment penalty under section 77 and section 75a hindalco has filed appeal challenging tax interest interest further he imposed penalty under section 76 of finance act equal to rs 200 per day from the date of the issue involved in these cases is whether the retrospective amendments made were good enough for collecting the tax liability from

M/S High Tech Engineers Vs. C.C, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

passed by the learned cestat in exercising its powers under section nbsp 129 of the customs act 1962 especially when the of appeal passed on 26 3 2007 vide order no 77 80 07 nbsp which nbsp remained uninterferred nbsp by hon are misconceived and fail constitution of india article 227 customs act 1962 section 129 or the other party to the appeal provided that an amendment which has the effect of enhancing the assessment or reducing

Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd Vs. Cce, Meerut-ii

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

the consigner or by the consignee of the goods nbsp section 65 50b requires goods transport agency to be a commercial 2683 85 11 get disposed alongwith appeal no st 1275 77 11 and st 1525 10 is disposed in above manner 8217 which implies that a concern engaged in the economic activity of transportation in commercial fashion shall only be brought to

M/S Municipal Corporation Jalandhar Vs. Cce, Ludhiana

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

ibid and also for imposition of penalty on them under section 76 77 and 78 ibid nbsp the show cause notices and penalties were imposed on the appellant under section 76 77 as well as 78 of the finance act 1994 nbsp demand against the appellant on the ground that the above activities resulted in providing services falling under the category of 8220

M/S thermotech, M/S Flevel International Pradeep Khanna Vs. Cce, Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

of rs 83 60 821 against m s thermotech under section 11a of central excise act 1944 ii imposed penalty of section 11a of the act iv imposed penalty of rs 77 95 808 on m s flevel international under rule 173q and partially remanded as indicated in the orders central excise act 1944 section 11a

M/S Science Centre Vs. Cce, Jaipur-i

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

tribunal and argued that there was sufficient cause for invoking section 80 of finance act 1994 for waiver of the penalties act and penalty of rs 1000 was imposed under section 77 of the act and penalty of rs 1 93 238 93 238 nbsp was imposed under section 78 of the act nbsp aggrieved by the order the appellants filed an appeal given in 2006 nbsp later government itself brought in an amendment in the act to the effect that both penalties cannot

M/S. Jabalpur Motors Ltd Vs. Cce, Indore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

march 2006 was imposed nbsp further penalties were imposed under section 76 and 77 also nbsp on appeal filed by revenue imposed nbsp further penalties were imposed under section 76 and 77 also nbsp on appeal filed by revenue the commissioner appeals view of the provisions in section 73 3 of finance act 1994 i am of the view that the scn issued

M/S. Aryan Coal Benefications Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

of the finance act along with imposition of penalties under section 75a 76 and 77 of the finance act 3 the the business auxiliary services another amount of rs 85 97 773 rupees eightyfive lakh ninetyseven thousand seven hundred seventythree only stand pronounced in the open court on 9 8 2012 finance act section 78

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

it has been already noticed that the taxing event under section 3 of the act is the production or manufacture of 61 or 62 of the first schedule to the tariff act produced or manufactured on job work shall be the rate private publishers of the amended rules and persons carrying out amendments on the web site of cbec it is most probably