Skip to content


Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: kerala Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 145 results (0.229 seconds)
Jan 18 1972 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. C.M. Kunhammed

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-18-1972

Reported in : [1974]94ITR179(Ker)

..... authority a corporation established by a central state or provincial act or a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 or iii where the sale or transfer of the ..... authority a corporation established by a central state or provincial act or a government company as denned in section 617 of the companies act 1956 or in connection with any amalgamation or succession referred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1972 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Nataraj Motor Service.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-1972

Reported in : [1972]86ITR109(Ker)

..... authority a corporation established by a central state or provincial act or a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 or in connection with any amalgamation ..... authority a corporation established by a central state or provincial act or a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 or in connection with any amalgamation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 1972 (HC)

income-tax Officer Vs. Mambad Timber and Estates (P.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-10-1972

Reported in : [1973]43CompCas332(Ker); [1973]89ITR312(Ker)

companies court rules 1959 which relates to an application under section 559 of the act reads 285 application to declare dissolution upon notice to the central government and the registrar of companies where the court declares the dissolution to have been void true or not 3 section 559 1 of the companies act 1956 reads 559 1 where a company has been dissolved

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1972 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. V. Damodaran

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-18-1972

Reported in : [1972]85ITR590(Ker)

reading of section 2 6a the term accumulated profits in sections 2 6a c and 2 6a e as it stood in the distribution of dividend the only restriction trader the companies s act is that no dividend shall be paid except of section 2 6a e of the indian income tax act 1922 26 we answer question no 1 in the affirmative

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1972 (HC)

State of Kerala Vs. A.R. Sulaiman Sait and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-31-1972

Reported in : AIR1972Ker274

with this award the plaintiffs moved for a reference under section 20 of the land acquisition act to the sub court 1970 pattadars namely plaintiffs 1 to 10 who wore in actual possession of the land claimed compensation at the rate of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1972 (HC)

S. Anthony Muthu and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-29-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Ker141

1966 in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 3 of the essential commodities act 1955 under clause 11 conferred on it by section 3 of the essential commodities act 1955 under clause 11 of the said order the central

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 1972 (HC)

M.K. Mohammad Kunhi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-07-1972

Reported in : [1973]92ITR341(Ker)

there was whether a particular deduction claimed was allowable under section 12 2 of the indian income tax act and on started proceedings under section 34 of the indian income tax act and assessed the assessee for rs 52 378 and rs

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1972 (HC)

George Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-12-1972

Reported in : AIR1972Ker181

interests in respect of which a compensation was made under section 11 or could have been claimed in the present case created by nature it is an encumbrance created by the act of the plaintiff himself such an encumbrance will extinguish by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1972 (HC)

P.A. Yoosuf Vs. Kumaranelloor Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-13-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Ker167

269 the point for determination is whether the wording of section 221 of madras act xiv of 1920 has extended thepower be under the second proviso to section 74 of the act the petitioner has come up to this court with this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1972 (HC)

Sankaran Sankaran Namboori Vs. Mathai Abraham

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-23-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Ker22

an end is not a promissory note as defined in section 4 of the negotiable instruments act 1881 7 as per hearing of this revision section 35 of the kerala stamp act may enable the plaintiff to resist the contention of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //