Skip to content


Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: gujarat Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 129 results (0.205 seconds)
Aug 18 1972 (HC)

The State of Gujarat Vs. Mahant Ranchhoddas Guru Atmaramdasji

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-18-1972

Reported in : AIR1974Guj115; (1973)GLR715

behalf must fail 22 46 47 appeal allowed property possession section 42 of specific relief act 1877 after death of x clear that a large number of suit properties are in actual physical control of the defendant who challenges the plaintiff s

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1972 (HC)

Himatlal Govindji Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat I

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-04-1972

Reported in : [1977]106ITR658(Guj)

it to non agricultural in view of the provisions of section 63 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act 1948 therefore exempt from assessment to wealth tax under the said act the question has arisen in the course of the assessee

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 1972 (HC)

Mathurbhai Hirjibhai Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-08-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj261; (1973)0GLR596

the requirements of the proviso to sub section 1 of section 6 of the land acquisition act will not be complied 12 petition dismissed property acquisition section 3 of land acquisition act and section 99 2 of gujarat panchayat act petitioner challenged

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1972 (HC)

Bankimchandra Shivashanker and ors. Vs. Vishnuprasad Meganlal Vaidya a ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-25-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj78; (1972)GLR905

loser and needs no protection it has also held that section 4 of the succession certificate act would apply to a intended to hold that section 4 of the succession certificate act applied only to such a suit for a sale on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 1972 (HC)

Bai Kanchanguari Chhagnalal Vs. Chandulal Virjibhai Tank

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj275; (1973)GLR532

sub section 1 sub section 1 stands by itself sub section 1 requires that the court must be satisfied i of 1968 under section 9 of the hindu marriage act 1955 act no 25 of 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1972 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Kantilal Manilal

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-28-1972

Reported in : [1973]90ITR289(Guj)

section 5 1 xiv of wealth tax act 1957 and section 6 of hindu succession act 1956 assessee assessed as hindu his mother pushpavati by virtue of section 6 of that act it appears that dinesh was also possessed of some separate

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 1972 (HC)

Vidyaben Vs. Jagdishchandra Nandshankar Bhatt and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-20-1972

Reported in : AIR1974Guj23; (1973)GLR328

desai submitted that under the proviso and the explanation to section 6 of the act in order to ascertain the share to 3 invited my attention to section 23 of the act which says that where a hindu intestate has left surviving

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 1972 (HC)

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Thakore Hemsing Abhesing (Since Decd. Th ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-27-1972

Reported in : (1973)14GLR945

a copy was served upon the learned government pleader no action was taken by the state of gujarat to bring other

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1972 (HC)

Patel Amarshibhai Dharamshibhai and anr. Vs. Lakadia Kantilal Damodar ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-28-1972

Reported in : (1973)14GLR639

the particular panchayat concerned but in an election petition under section 24 it is not competent to challenge an election of the state government by section 323 of the gujarat panchayats act 1961 the state government have made rules called gujarat gram

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1972 (HC)

Baldevji Krishnaji Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-11-1972

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1523; (1973)GLR153

13 and under the proviso to sub section 5 of section 13 it has been provided that any document purporting to prevention of food adulteration act hereinafter referred to as the act and sentenced to r i for one month and to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //