Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: kerala Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.271 seconds)Mrs. U.A. Sumathy and anr. Vs. Dig Vijay Chit Fund (P.) Ltd.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-01-1980
Reported in : [1983]53CompCas493(Ker)
33 that a prior application to the central govt under section 236 or the pendency of proceedings under sections 397 and filed in court but rule 11 a 9 of the companies court rules 1959 conceives of such an application in raghunath out is that the directors and the chief agent had actually received payment of the amounts and had thereafter attempted to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Sreenivasan Vs. Yoosuf Sagar Abdulla and Sons (P.) Ltd.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-29-1980
Reported in : [1983]53CompCas485(Ker)
leaving the parties to bear their own costs company investigation section 237 of companies act 1956 and sections 29 29 1 for an order under section 237 a ii of the companies act 1956 section 237 reads investigation of company s affairs a foreign national being so appointed the foreign exchange regulation act 1973 was not then in force and the predecessor enactment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Official Liquidator
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Mar-13-1980
Reported in : (1980)17CTR(Ker)272; [1982]134ITR136(Ker)
proceedings would be other legal proceedings within the meaning of section 446 1 11 reverting to the case on hand the more particularly in accordance with the provisions contained in the companies act and the companies court rules 3 the matter was particularly in accordance with the provisions contained in the companies act and the companies court rules 3 the matter was therefore
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarthiyayani Amma Vs. Govindan
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-06-1980
Reported in : AIR1980Ker224
i direct the parties to bear their costs property possession section 38 of specific relief act 1963 person in possession can a person in possession without lawful title can sustain an action for injunction against a person who has lawful or better
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Deputy Conservator of Forests, Nemmara Vs. K.S. Sarojini and anr.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Nov-25-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Ker44
power to remand is available to a tribunal functioning under section 64 of the motor mehicles act 1939 and that the jurisdiction it impliedly grants the power of doing all such acts or employing such means as are essentially necessary to its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTE.i. Narayanan and ors. Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Trichur ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-15-1980
Reported in : AIR1980Ker115
appeal to the supreme court motor vehicles stage carriage permit sections 46 and 47 of motor vehicles act 1939 and rules stage carriage permit sections 46 and 47 of motor vehicles act 1939 and rules 17 and 186 of kerala motor vehicles
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Vs. Palamattom Plantations (P. ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-03-1980
Reported in : [1982]134ITR99(Ker)
of a statute that had come into force in 1960 section 5 j of the act got attracted and the claim alanickal estate was retained by the alanickal company the transferee companies agreed to pay the gratuity due to the employees allotted deduction under section 5 j of the agrl income tax act 2 the reference has been made at the instance of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala State Industrial Development Cor ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jun-17-1980
Reported in : [1981]128ITR742(Ker)
of which the ito could validly initiate the proceedings under section 147 b in the light of the said decision we 1968 69 under section 147 b of the income tax act 1961 was not valid 2 the assessee is a public
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Thannirangad Service Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. State ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jun-02-1980
Reported in : [1980]46STC464(Ker)
hence the invocation of the power to tax conferred by section 5a of the act in these cases was illegal and under the kerala general sales tax act hereinafter called the act for the aforementioned assessment years the assessing authority took the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.P. Vijayakumar Vs. V.P. Moosa and ors.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Mar-04-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Ker31
of the permit after following the procedure laid down in section 57 of the m v act the regional transport authority procedure laid down in section 57 of the m v act the regional transport authority by order dated 21 12 1976
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT