Section 55 - Judgment Search Results

Samrat Holdings Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

reads as under i5j while adjudging quantum of penalty under section 15 i the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to

C.T.R. Mfg. Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

the transfer of unclaimed credit balances could be assessed under section 41 these amounts represented the trading liability in respect of

M/S. Cabot International Capital Vs. Adjudicating Officer and

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

contrary there is no such requirement in section 15a the section does not require pre existence of a guilty mind to

Chanchala and ors. Vs. Megh Singh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2480

they may be so required under the provisions of sub section 2 of section 205 of the code unless bound down

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Thippawwa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(2002)ACC717; 2002ACJ717

described as motor cab a motor cab is defined under section 2 15 of the motor vehicles act it states motor

Sri Durga Distillery Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2001]122STC170(Kar)

the law as it existed prior to the amendment of section 5 3 d on april 1 1986 that where the

E. Mallanagowda Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR718; 2001(6)KarLJ106

karnataka further r 2 actuated r 1 to act under section 15 1 of the madras act thus he cannot blow

Ravindra N. Tantry Vs. Shivaleela and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2001)ACC125; 2001ACJ1906; ILR2001KAR1676; 2001(6)KarLJ132

95 of the 1939 act and compared the same with sections 157 and 146 147 and 156 of the motor vehicles

Crown Shipping Agency Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (G)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)(74)ECC502

1 on hearing both sides it appeared that on a short point of law the main appeal itself could be...

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Maritime Collector

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC848; 2001(131)ELT328(Mad)

..... claim of the petitioner 4 the petitioner would further submit that under section xi of the central excise tariff act 1985 various textiles and textiles ..... are classified that note 3 of section xi lays down the heading nos 52 03 52 04 54 04 55 05 and 55 06 the sewing thread means ..... 3 of section xi laid down that for the purposes of heading nos 52 03 52 04 54 04 55 05 and 55 06 the sewing thread means .....