Section 55 - Judgment Search Results

Mobil Alaska Pipeline Company Vs. U.S.

Court : US Supreme Court

aboriginal land claims in the prudhoe bay area footnote 3 section 15 8 e sets the rate of interest at a this litigation see mobil alaska pipeline co v united states 557 f 2d 775 c a 5 1977 footnote 2 arctic

New York Vs. Earl

Court : US Supreme Court

york city police officer was driving through the south jamaica section of queens on his way home from a movie his

Minnesota Vs. Alexander

Court : US Supreme Court

to review the case on writ of certiorari footnote 2 section 404 states a the secretary of the army acting through

Hill Vs. Garner.

Court : US Supreme Court

and set this case for oral argument footnotes footnote 1 section 30 115 reads as follows no person transported by the

Bejoli Roy Chowdhry Vs. Amar Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi0182; 1977RLR464

failing them the parents and so on as provided in section 2 l iii of the act entered the foot steps

Beal Vs. Doe

Court : US Supreme Court

etc et al petitioners v jane doe etc nos 75 554 75 1440 and 75 442 june 20 1977 on writ

Dupuy Vs. Dupuy

Court : US Supreme Court

10 b of the securities exchange act of 1934 and sec rule 10b 5 in the wake of this court s not be barred from recovery unless he had been reckless 551 f 2d 1005 similarly the tenth and seventh circuits have

Commissioner of Income-tax and ors. Vs. Amsoi Tea Estate

Court : Guwahati

firm incurred a loss of rs 64 as computed under section 67 1 since the partners of the firm were liable

Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam, and Others Vs. Amaio Tea Setate.

Court : Guwahati

share of the loss of each of the partner under section 67 1 c 70 of the loss of the firm

Smt. Sohani Devi JaIn Vs. Income-tax Officer, a Ward and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... would have been referred to the commissioner for his decision under sub section 4 of section 124 sub section 5 of the section in clear terms lays down that no objection as to the ..... what is not authorised under the act is necessarily outside the powers conferred on them 55 the authorities under the income tax act are empowered to levy tax in cases of .....