Section 484 - Judgment Search Results

Webb's Farm Mechanization (P.) Ltd. and others Vs. Official Liquidator ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1996Kant65; [1999]97CompCas956(Kar); ILR1995KAR2991; 1995(5)KarLJ608

..... passed a resolution for voluntary winding up as prescribed under section 484 of the act mrs webb was appointed liquidator the liabilities ..... notifying those authorities under the first proviso to sub section 1 of section 394 of the act the company judge therefore directed ..... considers expedient and necessary the second proviso to sub section 1 of section 394 of the act demands submission of the report .....

A.V. Sampat, Official Liquidator Vs. Dunlop India Ltd. and anr.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (1996)87CompCas398

..... process was on in september 1990 bob fiscal resolved to voluntarily wind itself up under section 484 1 b of the companies act and the petitioner was appointed as the liquidator in ..... empowered to initiate this action as regards the objection that there is no resolution under section 512 empowering the liquidator to initiate proceedings the petitioner s counsel has aptly drawn our .....

State of A.P. Vs. S. Vishwanatha Raju and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(2)SC528; 1995(1)SCALE855; (1995)3SCC327; [1995]1SCR529

order1 heard counsel for thr parties 2 delay of 3 years and 178 days is condoned 3 substitution allowed leave...

Rajkishore Satpathy Vs. Harekrushna Satpathy and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1995(II)OLR332

co owner or co parcener of plot nos 483 and 484 defendant no 2 is the son of lingaraj and he

SandIn Vs. Conner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... offenses at disciplinary segregation up to 30 days or any sanction other than disciplinary segregation section 17 201 9 lists offenses punishable as low moderate misconduct and sets punishment at ..... abandons an approach that in practice is difficult to administer and which produces anomalous results 484 may under certain circumstances create liberty interests which are protected by the due process .....

Arunaben Jayantilal MIn Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1996)1GLR64

petitioner after the disposal of her special civil application no 484 of 1983 on 10 3 1983 7 it is not

Missouri Vs. Jenkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by the court as it would result in floor coverings with unsightly sections of mismatched carpeting and tile and individual walls possessing different shades of ..... united states v scotland neck city ed of ed 407 u s 484 491 n 5 1972 approving implicitly a desegregation plan which had a ..... united states v scotland neck city bd of ed 407 u s 484 491 1972 the district court s remedial plan in this case .....

Tome Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... admissibility of any of a t s out of court statements under that section or any other evidentiary principle these matters and others are for the court ..... v united states 485 u s 681 688 1988 united states v owens 484 u s 554 562 1988 where as with rule 801 d 1 b ..... s 153 1988 and indeed myself engaged in see united states v owens 484 u s 554 562 1988 similar use of the advisory committee notes more .....

Things Remembered, Inc. Vs. Petrarca

Court: US Supreme Court

..... filed a brief for the connecticut bar association commercial law and bankruptcy section as amicus curiae urging affirmance 126 trict of new york on ..... been limited by our later decision in carnegie mellon univ v cohill 484 u s 343 1988 as i understand the opinion we issue ..... united sav assn of tex v timbers of inwood forest associates ltd 484 u s 365 371 1988 statutory term that may seem ambiguous .....

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court fails to confront the evidence set out in the preceding section throughout its opinion the court refers uninformatively to wide awake s christian ..... mergens 496 u s 226 250 1990 hazelwood school dist v kuhlmeier 484 u s 260 270 272 1988 for that reason the university s ..... 835 i would not argue otherwise see hazelwood school dist v kuhlmeier 484 u s 260 270 273 1988 but i do suggest that this .....