Section 484 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 484 Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 2,640 results (0.073 seconds)Ginsberg Vs. New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1968
..... and people v bookcase inc 14 n y 2d 409 201 n e 2d 14 section 484 h in turn was replaced by l 1967 c 791 now 235 20 235 22 ..... might rationally conclude as it has that exposure to the materials proscribed by 484 h constitutes such an abuse section 484 e of the law states a legislative finding that the material condemned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRabeck Vs. New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-27-1968
..... on the score of vagueness a state statute which has already been repealed section 484 i was repealed by n y laws 1967 c 791 see ginsberg ..... of the supreme court of new york first judicial department syllabus former 484 i of the new york penal law which prohibited the sale of ..... to a minor under 18 years of age in violation of former 484 i new york penal law argues among other grounds that the statute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTurner Morrison and Co. Ltd. Vs. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal238
..... respect of directors and section 425 2 read with sections 484 to 497 and particularly sections 491 and 492 along with section 515 of the companies ..... by that other company it is expressly provided under sub section 6 of section 4 of the companies act that in case of a ..... of the indian companies act also whether the requirements of this section are fulfilled or not the applicant of course has not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVed Parkash Sawhney Vs. R.A. Wania and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi1; 4(1968)DLT668; [1969]24STC44(Delhi)
..... perma nand witness called against permanand bailable warrant for rs 500 00 and ntoice under section 484 a criminal procedure code be issued summon on the house of tirath singh was affixed thereforee be ..... enabling him to explain the circumstances appearing in evidence against him the power given under section 342 criminal procedure code it may be pointed out is nto to be used to elicit information .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAvery Vs. Midland County
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-01-1968
government assigned the performance of functions page 390 u s 484 affecting definable groups of constituents more than other constituents we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrunenthal Vs. Long Island Railroad Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-18-1968
sum in excess of 200 000 388 f 2d 480 484 while it is arguable that a fuller written factual discussion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTerry Vs. Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1968
..... or they may be conducting a dragnet search of all teenagers in a particular section of the city for weapons because they have heard rumors of an impending gang ..... 1963 wong sun v united states 371 u s 471 371 u s 479 484 1963 rios v united states 364 u s 253 364 u s 261 262 ..... 98 wong sun v united states 371 u s 471 371 u s 479 484 to give power to the police to seize a person on some grounds different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDebesh Chandra Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-21-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal180
..... services act 1951 is not affected by non compliance with sub section 2 of section 3 but the question is whether the home ministry s ..... at the centre mr chakraborty then invites my attention to page 484 of the paper book at this page we find the resolution ..... signed or authenticated by its joint secretary and establishment officer vide page 484 of the paper book would be treated as an executive action .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCameron Vs. Johnson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1968
..... narrowly regulating conduct which is intertwined with expression but for alleged violations of various sections of excessively broad louisiana statutes regulating expression itself the louisiana subversive activities and communist ..... justify the extraordinary remedy of an injunction 380 u s at 380 u s 484 we found such special circumstances in dombrowski the prosecutions there begun and threatened .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarrison Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1968
v united states 371 u s 471 371 u s 484 488 cf fahy v connecticut 375 u s 85 375
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial