Section 474 - Judgment Search Results

Andhra Bank and anr. Vs. Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Crime Po ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(2)ALT587; 1995(2)ALT(Cri)587; 1996CriLJ277

..... of suit in case these offences are integral part of offences under sections 474 and 477a even then procedure under section 195 1 b ii have to be complied with 195 1 c ..... to costs 13 petition allowed criminal interpretation sections 167 205 420 465 466 467 468 471 474 and 477a of indian penal code 1860 and sections 195 195 1 463 465 468 471 .....

State of A.P. Vs. S. Vishwanatha Raju and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(2)SC528; 1995(1)SCALE855; (1995)3SCC327; [1995]1SCR529

order1 heard counsel for thr parties 2 delay of 3 years and 178 days is condoned 3 substitution allowed leave...

Mr. Mohanrao Pandamudi Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by Com ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)2MLJ577

..... department central office bombay on form isd in duplicate for permission under section 19 1 d of foreign exchange regulation act 1973 for issue of ..... p velusami memberthus by reason of the government order g o ms 474 dated 3rd november 1986 everything that was necessary for the purpose ..... that after the state government issued the order g o ms no 474 dated 3 11 1986 the board of directors of tamil nadu .....

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. Vs. Pinette

Court: US Supreme Court

concurring injudgment witters v washington dept of servs for blind 474 u s 481 493 1986 o connor j concurring in

Thompson Vs. Keohane

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the standard governing federal habeas courts review of state court in custody determinations 5 a section 2254 governs federal habeas corpus proceedings instituted by persons in custody pursuant to the judgment of ..... d essentially elevated the townsend court s exhortation into a mandatory presumption of correctness miller 474 u s at 111 112 see also id at 112 emphasizing respect appropriately accorded .....

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court fails to confront the evidence set out in the preceding section throughout its opinion the court refers uninformatively to wide awake s ..... aside establishment clause challenges witters v washington dept of servs for blind 474 u s 481 487 488 1986 mueller v allen 463 u ..... citation omitted in witters v washington dept of servs for blind 474 u s 481 1986 for example we unanimously held that the .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tribe requested the state to enter into negotiations under paragraph 3 a sections 2710 d 7 b ii vii describe an elaborate remedial scheme ..... expresse d its intent to abrogate the immunity green v mansour 474 u s 64 68 1985 and second whether congress has acted ..... order to end a continuing violation of federal law green v mansour 474 u s at 68 the situation presented here however is sufficiently .....

Wilton Vs. Seven Falls Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

u s 237 241 1952 see also green v mansour 474 u s 64 72 1985 cardinal chemical co v morton

Mastrobuono Vs. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

s construction of its own state s law id at 474 t he interpretation of private contracts is ordinarily a question

California Dept. of Corrections Vs. Morales

Court: US Supreme Court

effect of a hearing postponement is not significant id at 474 703 p 2d at 106 107 this is because the