Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 474 Page 1 of about 55,901 results (0.022 seconds)

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Section 474

Title: Limitation for Recovery of Dues

State: Karnataka

Year: 1976

No distraint shall be made, no suit shall be instituted and no prosecution shall be commenced in respect of any sum due to the corporation under this Act after the expiration of a period of six years from the date on which distraint might first have been made, a suit might first have been instituted or prosecution might first have been commenced, as the case may be, in respect of such sum.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 474

Title: Trials Before High Court

State: Central

Year: 1973

When an offence is tried by the High Court otherwise than under section 407, it shall, in the trial of the offence, observe the same procedure as a Court of Sessions would observe, if it were trying the case.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Companies Act, 1956 Section 474

Title: Power to Exclude Creditors Not Proving in Time

State: Central

Year: 1956

The1[Tribunal] may fix a time or times within which creditors are to prove their debts or claims, or to be excluded from the benefit of any distribution made before those debts or claims are proved. _____________________ 1. Substituted by Act 11 of 2003, Section 77, for "Court".

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 474

Title: Having Possession of Document Described in Section 466 or 467, Knowing It to Be Forged and Intending to Use It as Genuine

State: Central

Year: 1860

1 [Whoever has in his possession any document or electronic record, knowing the same to be forged and intending that the same shall fraudulently or dishonestly be used as genuine, shall, if the document or electronic record is one of the description mentioned in section 466 of this Code], be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if the document is one of the description mentioned in section 467, shall be punished with 2 [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description, for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 21 of 2000, section 91 and Schedule I, for certain words (w.e.f. 17-10-2000). 2. Substituted by Act 26 of 1955, section 117 and Schedule, for 'transportation for life" (w.e.f. 1-1-1956).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Central Provinces Court of Wards Act, 1899 Section 39

Title: Exercise of Discretion Not to Be Questioned in Civil Court

State: Central

Year: 1899

No suit shall be brought in any Civil Court in respect of the exercise of any discretion conferred by this Act.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Central Provinces Court of Wards Act, 1899 Section 41

Title: Application of the Act to Estates of Rulers of Indian States

State: Central

Year: 1899

1[41. Application of the Act to estates of Rulers of Indian States The powers and functions conferred on the State Government by or under this Act shall, in relation to the estates of Rulers of Indian States, be the powers and functions of the Central Government. __________________________ 1. Inserted by C.O. 29.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 10

Title: Special Provision Relating to Employees of Person Who Produces, Supplies, Distributes or Sells Infant Milk Substitutes, Etc

State: Central

Year: 1992

(1) No person who produces, supplies, distributes or sells infant milk substitutes or feeding bottles or infant foods shall fix the remuneration of any of his employees or give any commission lo such employees on the basis of the volume of sale of such substitutes or bottles or foods made by such employees. (2) The employees of such person shall not perform any function which relates to educating a pregnant woman or mother of an infant on pre-natal or post-natal care of the infant.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 13

Title: Power to Seize Infant Milk Substitutes, Etc., or Containers Thereof,

State: Central

Year: 1992

(1) If any food inspector or authorised officer has reason to believe that in respect of any infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof, the provisions of this Act have been or are being contravened, he may seize such substitute or bottle or food or container. (2) No such substitute or food or bottle or container shall be retained by any food inspector or authorised officer for a period exceeding ninety days from the date of its seizure unless the approval of the District Judge, within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such seizure has been made, has been obtained for such retention.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 14

Title: Confiscation

State: Central

Year: 1992

Any infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof, in respect of which any provision of this Act has been or is being contravened, shall be liable to confiscation: Provided that where it is established to the satisfaction of the court adjudging the confiscation that the person in whose possession, power or control any such substitute or bottle or food or container is found is not responsible for the contravention of the provisions of this Act, the court may, instead of making an order for the confiscation of such substitute or bottle or food or container, make such other order authorised by this Act against the person guilty of the breach of the provisions of this Act as it may think fit.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 15

Title: Power to Give Option to Pay Cost in Lieu of Confiscation

State: Central

Year: 1992

(1) Whenever any confiscation is authorised by this Act, the court adjudging it may, subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order adjudging the confiscation, give to the owner thereof an option to pay in lieu of confiscation such cost not exceeding the value of the infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof in respect of which the confiscation is authorised as the court thinks fit. (2) On payment of the cost ordered by the court the seized infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container shall be returned to the person from whom it was seized on the condition that such person shall, before making any distribution, sale or supply of such substitute or bottle or food or container, give effect to the provisions of this Act.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //