Section 24 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 24 Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 519 results (0.447 seconds)Kanpur Development Authority Vs. Ajay Verma
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Mar-07-2012
..... a sufficient cause is a discretionary jurisdiction vested in the court by section 5 if sufficient cause is not proved nothing further has to be ..... litigations causing laws delay and bringing bad name t the judicial system 24 thus no sufficient cause has been shown to us by the ..... meritless litigation dismissed with punitive costs para 7 9 10 11 18 24 25 26 condonation of delay euro ldquo euro oelig .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbhilesh Babu, Minor Rep by His Mother Saraswathy Babu Vs. State of Ta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2012
..... to various communal categories as illegal 4 according to the petitioner under section 4 of the act 31 of seats should be left for ..... to mbbs course for the year 2012 2013 in paragraph nos 24 and 34 the rule of reservation has been indicated which reads ..... as follows ldquo vi counselling procedure single window system 24 the selection will be made on merit basis and by counselling .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRangasamy Gounder and Others Vs. Valliammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-2012
..... to refer to the following provisions from the standing orders of the board of revenue section i in villages 1 general i scale of grant portions of gramanattam or village ..... as to what is 39 anganam 39 what is its correlation to the metric system 24 the plaintiffs no doubt simply claimed 20 cents in the suit property as their property .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Dhanajay Nagesh Naik and Others Vs. Shri Sudam Gopal Pednekar Sha ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
..... also stands dismissed 31 list for compliance on 6 7 2012 consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 21 b cases referred 1 asia resorts ltd v usha breco ltd ..... frivolous and cantankerous litigations causing laws delay and bringing bad name to the judicial system 24 it is well settled that no leniency should be shown to such type of litigants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayana Iit Academy Vs. Atishya JaIn and Another
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Feb-14-2012
..... are that respondents complainants in the district forum filed a complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act 1986 for short the act ..... considered opinion that the jurisdiction conferred on the national commission under section 21 b of the act has been transgressed it was not ..... on 20 4 2012 consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 14 1 d 21 b 24 a costs quantum cases referred 1 anshul .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Avdhut Construction Builders and Developers and Another Vs. Joy C ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
..... day because an effective alternative remedy was available to the petitioner under section 23 of the act and the orders passed by the state ..... list on 31 8 2012 for compliance consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 21 b constitution of india article 227 consumer ..... litigations causing laws delay and bringing bad name to the judicial system 24 we do not find any infirmity or ambiguity in the impugned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuri Rajendra Tower S.R.A. Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd Dinesh V. Shah (Chairm ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-14-2012
..... about entertaining the consumer complaint since barred by limitation as per section 24 a of the consumer protection act 1986 the act for ..... workmanship in the construction of the building also claimed rs 28 24 315 as compensation for encroaching 700 sq ft of common passage ..... dispute hence no claim referring to it valued at rs 28 24 315 could be entertained much less could be granted 13 in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Narne Estates (P) Ltd., Rep.by Its Chairman Managing Director Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... that date the complaint filed is well within the period of limitation as prescribed by section 24 of the consumer protection act even otherwise the cause of action subsists as the statement ..... appellant company cancelled the allotment of the plot and informed the respondent through letter dated 24 2 2006 the complaint is not filed within the period of limitation from the date .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.K. Maheshwari Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
..... they were required to be heard before grant of ex parte interim relief is contrary to section 24 of a t act it is stated only to be rejected 29 in conclusion ..... this factor as a vitiating element must be accepted with great caution and circumspection 24 the respondents have not brought any other material on record which may have weighed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Pravati Dash and Eight Others Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
..... sachindananda jena preferred g i a case no 36 of 2004 under section 24 b of the 2 orissa education act 1969 hereinafter referred to ..... above circumstances the tribunal dismissed the application filed by the appellants under section 24 b of the act registered as g i a case no 36 ..... to the direction of this court the director of higher education on 24 6 1989 found 22 persons were working in the college as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial