Skip to content


Section 2 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 2 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.696 seconds)
Oct 05 2005 (TRI)

Satish Kumar Vs. Hutchison Essar Telecome Ltd.

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2005

..... the part of the op the deficiency in service as defined under section 2 1 g of the act means any fault imperfection shortcoming or inadequacy ..... to record room appeal allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g comparative citations 2006 1 clt 251 2005 4 cpj 376 ..... receiving the payment of the cash card and again after 13 days 2 we have perused the impugned order and find that the district forum .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 2005 (TRI)

Mandeep Kang Vs. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority and A ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Oct-03-2005

..... purpose and as such she was not a consumer in view of section 2 d i of the consumer protection act there is no evidence on ..... be communicated to the parties free of charge consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g case referred iv 2003 cpj 362 distinguished para 14 comparative ..... that no case was made out for granting any relief to her 2 briefly stated the facts are that the appellant took part in public .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 2005 (TRI)

Sr. Citizen Home Complex Welfare Society Vs. J.L. Seth and Another

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Jun-21-2005

..... falls within the definition of deficiency in service as contemplated under section 2 1 g of the consumer protection act which means any ..... room appeal partly allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g comparative citations 2006 1 clt 565 2006 1 cpj ..... such interest could not have been awarded by the district forum section 14 of the consumer protection act empowers the district forum only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 2005 (HC)

Ram Murti Tripathi Son of Late Sri Bechan Tripathi Vs. State Public Se ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-26-2005

Reported in: [2006(108)FLR539]

..... act is properly framed 4 the important part of the act is sections 2 and 3 which shall be deemed to have come into force ..... determining quantum of compensation 4 the important part of the act is sections 2 and 3 which shall be deemed to have come into force ..... of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 2005 (TRI)

Dr. JaIn Airways (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Gulf Airways (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Jul-13-2005

..... upon the o p which amounts to deficiency in service as contemplated by section 2 1 g of the consumer protection act 1986 which means any fault ..... consigned to record room complaint disposed of consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g comparative citation 2007 ..... proceedings and interest on the damages be ordered in favour of the complainant 2 as against this the o p has alleged that being a case of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2005 (HC)

Parshuram Bama Mhatre Vs. S. Chakravarty, Commissioner of Police

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-15-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)MhLj76

..... public order and as such you are a dangerous person as defined in section 2 b 1 i am further satisfied that you will again indulge in ..... public order and as such you are a dangerous person as defined in section 2 b 1 i am further satisfied that you will again indulge in ..... c r no 77 of 2004 in relation to the offences punishable under sections 384 and 387 of the indian penal code in relation to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2005 (TRI)

K.E. Moses (Dr.) Vs. M.T.N.L.

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-2005

..... in service on the part of the respondent which in terms of section 2 1 g of the consumer protection act means any fault imperfection shortcoming ..... record room appeal disposed of consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g comparative citation 2006 1 cpj 448 ..... such allegation of deficiency in service by the respondent is not justified 2 feeling aggrieved the appellant has directed this appeal 3 the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 2005 (HC)

Pearey Lal and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-18-2005

Reported in: 118(2005)DLT479; 2005(81)DRJ20

..... proceedings were a pressure tactic to extract money from the respondent 10 section 2 b of the contempt of courts act 1971 defines a civil ..... rs 10 000 in each contempt petition contempt of courts 1971 section 2 6 civil contempt only because an order is enforceable by a ..... respondent would be liable to civil imprisonment for a period of 2 months 32 liberty granted to the applicant to seek revival for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2005 (TRI)

Rishi Vs. Pushpa

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2005

..... or medical negligence criminal negligence is distinguishable from deficiency in service as defined under section 2 1 g of the consumer protection act 1986 criminal negligence involves element of rashness it ..... and attracts sentence of imprisonment and fine on the other hand deficiency as defined under section 2 1 g of the act means any fault imperfection shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 2005 (TRI)

Ravi Kumar Khemka Vs. Sunil Kumar

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Feb-11-2005

..... for the appellant that respondent is not a consumer as defined under section 2 1 d of consumer protection act 1986 does not find favour with ..... record room appeal dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g and section 2 1 r comparative citation 2005 3 cpj 202 ..... 3 1996 and therefore was wrongly held guilty for deficiency in service 2 we have perused the open offer floated by the appellant the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //