Section 2 - Judgment Search Results

Jasvinder Kaur Vs. Delhi Financial Corporation

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... if the complainant is a consumer within the meaning of section 2 1 d of the act even then it cannot be stated ..... order as to costs complaint dismissed in limine consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g case referred 1992 3 cpj 48 nc comparative citation ..... art printers and std centre has filed the present complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as .....

Govt. Tpt. Service Vs. S.L. Mishra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2002(94)FLR454]; (2002)IIILLJ265SC; (2002)10SCC291

..... is dismissed s rajendra babu and s n variava jj motor transport workers act nbsp section 2 g the government set up a separate department known as government transport service which had ..... undertaking engaged in carrying passengers as defined in section 2 g of the motor transport workers act and is covered by sub section 4 of section 1 therefore we find that the view taken .....

Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Member, Motor Acci ...

Court: Guwahati

..... thereupon have without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub section 2 of section 149 the right to contest the claim on all or ..... thereupon have without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub section 2 of section 149 the right to contest the claim on all or ..... that the opposite party has contested the claim effectively 5 section 170 of motor vehicles act allow impleading of insurance company .....

Cit Vs. R. Rajarathnam

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]253ITR359(Mad)

..... vitiated any presumption that the department may seek to draw on the basis of sub section 2 would not be of any assistance to the revenue there must be a positive finding ..... vitiated any presumption that the department may seek to draw on the basis of sub section 2 would not be of any assistance to the revenue there must be a positive finding .....

Indian Oxygen Limited Vs. the Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1396

..... of his employees who was a tenant within the meaning of section 2 h ii of the act after evicting the defendant tenant was not ..... appeal dismissed bihar buildings lease rent and eviction control act 1977 section 2 h ii eviction of premises on the ground of personal necessity accommodation ..... seeking eviction motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59 1988 section 166 a k patnaik cj a k gohil s samvatsar jj .....

Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Derby Textiles Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2002]126STC545(SC)

..... namely january 1 1988 to december 31 1988 the previous year has been defined in section 2 m which reads as under previous year means the twelve months ending on the 31st ..... namely january 1 1988 to december 31 1988 the previous year has been defined in section 2 m which reads as under previous year means the twelve months ending on the 31st .....

Krisnna Vasudeo Kotwal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)ILLJ404Bom

..... board on august 29 1989 are bad inlaw as the relevant factors provided insub section 2 of section 10 were not takeninto consideration 3 prior to the present writ petition the petitioner ..... labouradvisory board on august 29 1989 are bad inlaw as the relevant factors provided insub section 2 of section 10 were not takeninto consideration dingare commissioner of labour maharashtra brought to the notice .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Salma and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2003ACJ73

..... not have been liable to pay but for the said provisions section ii of the policy dealt with liability of third party and ..... use of the vehicle for hire and reward however as per section ii of policy which dealt with liability of third party and ..... on question of quantum of compensation affirmed motor vehicle insurer liability section 174 of the motor vehicles act 1988 insurer claimed exoneration .....

Smt. Santosh Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... does not fall within the definition of a consumer as defined under section 2 1 d ii of the act since payment of consideration is an essential ingredient ..... of the o p complaint dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d comparative citation 2002 1 cpj 495 ..... rumnita mittal member 1 in the present complaint filed under section 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to .....

Choudhary Construction Company Vs. the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj409; 2002(1)WLN40

..... act 1994 11 3 in default of the payment of tax payable under sub section 1 or sub section 2 the amount of tax shall be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue ..... act 1994 11 3 in default of the payment of tax payable under sub section 1 or sub section 2 the amount of tax shall be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue .....