Section 17 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 17 Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 37,213 results (0.362 seconds)Shivangouda Sannalingangowda Patil (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Godigevva Al ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-20-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)KarLJ497
..... court 9 in the result the appeal is dismissed parties to bear their owncosts throughout section 17 security interest enforcement amendment rules 2007 rule 13 as amended anand byrareddy j payment ..... of prescribed court fee auction sale appealed against under section 17 question as to payment of court fee for appeals amendment to security interest enforcement rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Special Land Acquisition Officer, K.R. Project Vs. Shivanna
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-26-2002
Reported in: ILR2002KAR4956; 2003(2)KarLJ404
..... of the case there is no order as to costs section 17 1a 3 land acquisition act 1894 section 4 2 p d dinakaran c j v g ..... act the questions which may not be raised in an appeal under section 100 of the cpc cannot be raised the miscellaneous second appeal can ..... be entertained by this court within the limitations prescribed by section 100 of the cpc and it is not open to the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.N. Amarnath Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-04-2002
Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Kar)163; ILR2002KAR5399; [2003]259ITR590(KAR); [2003]259ITR590(Karn)
..... and march 11 2002 respectively are hereby quashed rule ismade absolute sections 17 a 70 ram mohan reddy j writ jurisdiction allegation of ..... by filing a revision petition before the income tax commissioner under section 264 of the act the said petition came to be ..... requested the department to rehear the matter under the proviso to section 129 of the act 7 before the commissioner the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUdhha Lal Meena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2002
Reported in: 2002VIIAD(Delhi)599; 99(2002)DLT715; 2002(64)DRJ260; 2003(3)SLJ281(Delhi)
..... the petitioner moved the central administrative tribunal by filing the said application in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunal act before the learned tribunal the petitioner had urged various ..... and even so far as satbir singh is concerned he had only given some suggestion 17 he even although had been given an opportunity refused to make his statement in defense .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSolid and Correct Engineering Works Vs. C.C. and C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC614Tri(Mum.)bai
..... site of the clients thereby making them the manufacturer in terms of section 2 f of the central excise act 1944 the assessees on the ..... called as goods consequently the confirmation of duty thereupon would not sustain 17 since we have held thus we do not find it necessary to ..... tribunal judgment in the case of rughmani packwell traders v cce 1996 17 rlt 565 as also on the tribunal judgment in the case of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPress Trust of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Press Trust of India Employees ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR567; (2003)1BOMLR109; [2003(96)FLR565]; (2003)ILLJ709Bom; 2002(4)MhLj653
..... was in issue was transfer from what is known as lalpuri section to another section in the same local area it is clear the learned ..... correct the errors one should keep in mind the principle behind section 465 criminal procedure code any and every irregularity or infraction of a procedural ..... at bay that would mean the failure of the very system 17 there is no substance in the petition and the same is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaiyed Munir Ali Ahmedmiya and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Guj39
..... same 8 on merits it has been submitted by him that under the provisions of section 17 46 of the gujarat secondary education act 1972 it is open to the board to ..... this court would not like to interfere with the final decision taken by the board 17 in the circumstances the petition is rejected 4 board on and from 18 4 2002 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEicher Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jan-30-2002
Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT136Tri(Chennai)
..... single heading 8483 when they have been specifically designed fur use with the vehicles of section xvii he therefore held that they cannot be covered as part of vehicles under appropriate headings ..... confirming the order of the lower authority had also relied on board s circular no 17 90 cx 4 dated 7 9 90 which clarified that transmission elements like gearing gear .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Rex Rubber Works
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-21-2002
Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT573Tri(Mum.)bai
..... as parts of trolley trailers etc fall under chapter 87 further note 2 b to section xvii under which chapter 87 is covered makes it very clear that the expression parts does .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSukhchaIn Singh Vs. Chandigarh Administration Through Secretary Health ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Nov-07-2002
..... s p kapoor member 1 this is a complaint filed under section 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter for short referred ..... be supplied to the parties free of charges consumer protection act 1986 section 15 case referred i 2002 cpj 211 referred para 6 comparative ..... that the attending doctors of general hospital sector 16 chandigarh on 17 11 2000 and 20 11 2000 were negligent in diagnosis or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial