Section 14 Of The Impugned Act Which We Are Striking Down - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 14 of the impugned act which we are striking down Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.8 seconds)Bombay University and College Teacher's Union Vs. State of Maharashtra ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-19-1990
Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR324
..... section 2 26 of the act teacher means a member of the teaching staff and includes the head of a school have been distinctly and elaborately catalogued 149 we therefore strike down ..... which should inform us in considering whether the impugned provision of rule 42 offends the guarantee of equality we ..... violative of the guarantee of equality under article 14 of the constitution of india ii the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUchhabananda Samantarary and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jun-21-1990
Reported in : AIR1991Ori145
..... and if the impugned act does not suffer from the vice or discrimination then it is difficult for a court to strike down an act on the ground ..... tribunal be constituted which would have 3 members one judicial member one accounts member ..... section 41 a of the arbitration act form a class and such a classification is permissible and cannot be held to be violative of article 14 of the constitution we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamat and Co. and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-27-1990
Reported in : [1991]80STC226(Kar)
..... which extended the benefit to all and therefore striking down 1977 notification would be academic it may appear to be so but it is our duty to point out the defects in the impugned ..... violative of article 14 as well as article 301 6 we do not think that we should go into the question as to whether sub section 5 of section 8 of the act has to be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRati Ram and 7 ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-06-1990
Reported in : 1991(20)DRJ137
principle of fair play and reasonableness action envisaged by articles 14 and 16 of the constitution the application was thereforee allowed the impugned show cause notice dated 17 8 1988 the impugned order of removal from service dated 13 12 1988 and ground amounted to imposing a penalty by way of disciplinary action in bhola ram v union of india through the general or if in fact by way of punishment it can strike down the same 12 sanjiv kumar aggarwal scase was followed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.C. Yadav and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-20-1990
Reported in : AIR1990SC857; [1990(60)FLR523]; JT1990(1)SC278; (1990)IILLJ138SC; 1990(1)SCALE229; (1990)2SCC189; [1990]1SCR470; 1990(1)LC636(SC); (1990)2UPLBEC898
of validity of relaxation the court made observation that rule 14 did not permit any general relaxation of the nature ordered for appointment to class i service by direct appointment by transfer of an officer already in service of the state government oblique purposes or mala fide the court has power to strike down the same but exercise of power of relaxation to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBombay Labour Union Vs. Haulage Corporation and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-05-1990
Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR403; [1991(63)FLR144]
legislature has taken care of providing such specific power under section 44 of the code then there could be no reason i hold that the strike was illegal only upto the 14th day of the service of the notice dated 13 8 the pending reference inhibited the commencing and continuing of the impugned strike 5 the result of the foregoing discussion is that recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act 1971 pulp act 2 the first respondent was in the out the workers the employer also can proceed against the striking workers who have launched upon an illegal strike that this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSandeep Barar and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-30-1990
Reported in : AIR1990SC600; JT1990(1)SC94; 1990(1)SCALE85; (1990)2SCC187; 1990(1)LC447(SC)
and r s bachawat jj the assessee firm consisting of 14 partners applied for registration under s 26a of the income applied for registration under s 26a of the income tax act 1922 one g who was a partner of the assessee superseded by the instructions dated august 6 1986 c we strike down the instructions issued by director of sports contained in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank of India Vs. T.S. Kelawala and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-04-1990
Reported in : (1990)92BOMLR558; [1990(60)FLR898]; JT1990(2)SC339; 1990(1)KLT843(SC); (1990)IILLJ39SC; (1990)4SCC744; [1990]3SCR214; 1991(2)SLJ121(SC); 1990(2)LC424(SC); (1991)1UPLBEC283
..... necessary ingredients of the definition of strike in section 2 q of the industrial disputes act existed and it was not a ..... pointed out earlier 15 hence we are unable to sustain the impugned decision which is untenable in law the ..... of a statutory provision laying down such a rule it was impermissible for ..... out was effected from august 14 1984 subsequently there were negotiations between the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHotel Hans Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-30-1990
Reported in : 43(1991)DLT176; [1991(62)FLR411]
no lock out can be declared unless the provisions of section are complied with section 23 prohibits lock out during the so also the workmen named at seriall numbers 3 9 14 35 38 had ceased to be employees before the passing had ceased to be employees before the passing of the impugned order we declare that there is no lock out in a special situation where the machinery under the industrial disputes act is already set in motion and where its effective continuation before the conciliation officer apparently a there was a partial strike by the workmen by the end of december 1988 resulting
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Direct Recruit Class-ii Engineering Officers' Association and othe ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-02-1990
Reported in : AIR1990SC1607; (1990)92BOMLR360; [1990(60)FLR918]; JT1990(2)SC264; 1990(2)KarLJ73; 1990(1)SCALE839; (1990)2SCC715; [1990]2SCR900; 1990(2)SLJ40(SC); 1990(2)LC314(SC); (1990)
..... striking down the above rules has not been directly questioned in this court 8 the main rules which ..... the constitution read with section 81 6 of the bombay re organisation act 1960 and were called ..... high court we are satisfied that a change in the form of attack against the impugned statute would ..... prescribed for regular substantive appointments in the service 14 mr tarkunde in the course of his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT