Section 14 Of The Impugned Act Which We Are Striking Down - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 14 of the impugned act which we are striking down Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 301 results (2.633 seconds)Gulamahamed Tarasaheb and ors. Vs. State of Bombay and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-22-1960
Reported in : AIR1962Bom97; (1961)63BOMLR323; ILR1961Bom491
..... reason for striking down the law itself as unreasonable in our view the contention of mr pendse that the impugned notification is ..... committee the composition of which was in conformity with the principles laid down in section 9 of the act under section 9 the advisory board ..... under section 22 of the act and therefore there is contravention of art 14 of the constitution now in the first instance we do .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Nath Bhuyan Vs. Official Liquidator, Puri Bank Ltd.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Mar-11-1960
Reported in : AIR1961Ori57; [1962]32CompCas584(Orissa)
be made it therefore appears that an appeal filed under section 173 cannot be entertained i e cannot be admitted for of the period covered in the civil court under section 14 of the limitation act in that particular case there were where the proceeding is founded upon the same cause of action and is prosecuted in good faith in a court which court by the advocate for bhuyan with a prayer to strike out and drop the execution cases on nov 12 1954
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamchandra Vishnu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-19-1960
Reported in : AIR1961MP247
the principle of equality before the law embodied in article 14 om prakash v state of punjab air 1951 punj 93 inferior in merit as disclosed by the marks obtained were actually admitted these facts show that like were not treated alike had been statutory rules we would not have hesitated to strike down such of those rules as offend against the provisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwadesamitran Limited, Madras Vs. their Workmen
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-01-1960
Reported in : AIR1960SC762; [1960(1)FLR337]; (1960)ILLJ504SC; [1960]3SCR144
statutorily recognised by s 25 g of the act this section provides inter alia that where any workman in an industrial such is not open to challenge in the present appeal 14 in the result the appeal fails and is dismissed with is raised by retrenched workmen on the ground that their impugned retrenchment amounts to unfair labour practice or victimisation 10 it s 10 1 c of the industrial disputes act 1947 act xiv of 1947 hereinafter called the act one of these the said demands were not granted they would go on strike the appellant pointed out to the respondents that it was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Bata Shoe Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. D.N. Ganguly and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-15-1960
Reported in : AIR1961SC1158; [1961(2)FLR183]; (1961)ILLJ303SC; [1961]3SCR308
september 2 1954 reliance in this connection is placed on sections 18 and 19 of the act as they were at tribunal with respect to these two workmen must be upheld 14 this brings us to the case of eleven workmen who labour commissioner apparently was not prepared to concur with this action of the parties as appears from his letter of september that there was no reason for staging such an illegal strike in hot haste it also held that they were sent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGarment Cleaning Works Vs. Babulal Shamlal and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-24-1960
Reported in : (1960)IILLJ612Bom
..... impugned orders invalid and inoperative 11 it is true that we are in the present applications concerned with a different section of the industrial disputes act ..... part in an illegal strike which was unjustified ex c 2 the departmental inquiry was held on 14 january 1960 and 23 ..... s 33 2 b unless certain conditions are fulfilled section 25f lays down that no workman can be retrenched until certain .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Cotton Manufacturers Ltd., Kanpur Vs. U.P. Government and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-10-1960
Reported in : AIR1960All734; [1960(1)FLR564]
clauses b c d and g of section 3 and sections 6 a and 8 of the u p industrial disputes dispute which should be referred and it acted without jurisdiction 14 for the purpose of the second point reliance has been to end and the objects it was to subserve the act has therefore to be viewed as a whole and its object of the act is the prevention of industrial strife strikes and lockouts and the promotion o industrial peace and not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Associated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. P.D. Vyas and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-11-1960
Reported in : AIR1960SC665; (1960)62BOMLR563; [1961(2)FLR569]; (1960)ILLJ563SC; (1960)IIMLJ107(SC); [1960]2SCR974
is one more section to which reference may be made section 15 2 b provides that the rules which the appropriate was competent to respondents 2 and 1 to make the impugned modifications in the draft standing orders submitted by the appellants amendment of 1956 purely academic 6 section 3 of the act requires the employer to submit draft standing orders section 3 no 16 2 in the draft standing orders provided that striking work either singly or with other workers without giving fourteen
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCaltex (India) Ltd. Vs. their Workmen
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-11-1960
Reported in : AIR1960SC1262; (1960)IILLJ12SC
any relevance when the tribunal is considering an application under section 33 of the act besides in the present case a west bengal v coal shipment p ltd civil appeals nos 1494 to 1498 of 1971 decided on october 14 1971 c tribunal is considering an application under section 33 of the act besides in the present case a detailed statement has been the appellant has also agreed not to treat the illegal strike as a break in service for the specific purposes only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdur Rahim Vs. State of Madras (Secretary, Industries, Labour and Co- ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-21-1960
Reported in : (1961)IILLJ213Mad
..... by the act on such a person as an employer we have struck down section 2 g i of the act as an ..... respective rights article 19 of our constitution strikes a balance between such conflicting rights it guarantees ..... materials which the government of the province had before them before promoting in the legislature the impugned statute ..... and not the agents of the proprietor 14 it could not be said that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT