Section 137 - Judgment Search Results

Kishori Lal Panuri and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.72

..... is bound to take action under section 138 both sections 137 and 138 are imperative in their terms the magistrate ..... the former alternative the magistrate is bound to take action under section 137 and if he adopts the second alternative then the magistrate ..... magistrate should have taken evidence in the matter as prescribed in section 137 cr p c 5 it may be the case that .....

In Re: Muse Bagas Abheram

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR563

..... the magistrate s satisfaction therefore he makes the order under section 137 4 the question was not whether the claim was established ..... the magistrate s satisfaction therefore he makes the order under section 137 4 the question was not whether the claim was established ..... must therefore be set aside criminal procedure code act v of 1898 sections 133 137 bona fide claim dispute to be settled by civil .....

In Re: Aluvala Guruviah

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ216

..... no punishment can follow unless the procedure laid down in section 140 is adopted but neither section 137 nor section 139 declares as section 136 does the liability to punishment 3 the public ..... no punishment can follow unless the procedure laid down in section 140 is adopted but neither section 137 nor section 139 declares as section 136 does the liability to punishment swaminadhan on behalf of .....

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

law walker v sauvinet 92 u s 90 re converse 137 u s 624 caldwell v texas 137 u s 692

Empire State Cattle Co. Vs. Atchison, T. and S.F. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the usage of trade is no deviation hostetter v park 137 u s 31 137 u s 40 so also in

Southern Pine Lumber Co. Vs. Ward

Court: US Supreme Court

and dismiss under rule 9 was page 208 u s 137 made the contention is without merit green v elbert 137

Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. Vs. Wilder

Court: US Supreme Court

..... company from the burden for a certain time the drift of the section cannot be made clearer by lengthy restatement it starts with exoneration and ..... argued october 28 29 1908 decided november 16 1908 211 u s 137 appeal from the supreme court of the territory of hawaii syllabus in ..... supreme court honolulu rapid transit co v wilder 211 u s 137 1908 honolulu rapid transit and land company v wilder no 23 .....

In Re Metropolitan Railway Receivership

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the circuit court under 5 of the act of 1875 already cited by that section it must appear to the satisfaction of the circuit court that such suit does ..... statutes defining the jurisdiction of the circuit court acts of march 3 1875 c 137 1 18 stat 470 march 3 1887 c 373 1 24 stat 552 august ..... of the circuit court 1 comp stat 507 508 act march 3 1875 c 137 1 18 stat 470 act march 3 1887 c 373 1 24 stat 552 .....

In Re Moore

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the authorized removal is only of those cases of which by the prior section original jurisdiction is given to the united states circuit courts but this ignores ..... 133 u s 315 133 u s 320 in re pennsylvania co 137 u s 451 137 u s 454 fisk v henarie 142 u s 459 142 u ..... nat bank v morgan 132 u s 141 fitzgerald construction company v fitzgerald 137 u s 98 in shaw v quincy mining company 145 u s 444 .....

Asbell Vs. Kansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the police power or really and substantially a regulation of interstate commerce section 27 of chap 495 of the laws of kansas of 1905 ..... of cattle coming from other states reid v colorado 187 u s 137 congress has not enacted any legislation destroying the right of a ..... and admitting those which are healthy reid v colorado 187 u s 137 the state may not however for this purpose exclude all animals .....